review for correctness

USAGE SUMMARY

'review for correctness' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to suggest that someone should take an extra step to double-check the accuracy and completeness of a task. For example: "Let's review for correctness before submitting the application."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

Science

News & Media

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

60 human-written examples

Scrolls are reviewed for correctness by rabbis and students, and, increasingly, vetted with computer programs that use optical character recognition for spell-checking.

The New York Times

As a result, actual oversight, in which real decisions are reviewed for their correctness, fairness, or faithfulness to a rule happens only rarely, if at all.

Princeton University

Upon completion of coding, all coding sheets were merged into one common codebook and reviewed by both authors for correctness.

BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders

Project grading: Projects will by default be graded automatically for correctness, though we will review projects individually as necessary to ensure that they receive the credit they deserve.

University of California, Berkeley

Additonally, make speedup will now check for correctness.

University of California, Berkeley

Checking for correctness with make testAll and then make test2 is slow, can I test correctness on smaller matrices first?

University of California, Berkeley

The online quizzes were not graded for correctness.

Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications

All identifications on phosphopeptides were manually validated for correctness.

Plosone

Each sentence had to be judged for correctness.

Plosone

All physicians verified the categories for correctness.

Human Resources for Health

Exercises are controlled for correctness of performance.

BMC Geriatrics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "review for correctness", clearly define the criteria for correctness to ensure a consistent and objective evaluation.

Common error

Avoid assuming a shared understanding of "correctness". Explicitly state what constitutes a correct outcome to prevent subjective interpretations and ensure consistent application of standards.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "review for correctness" functions primarily as a directive, often used to ensure quality control and accuracy in various processes. Ludwig AI indicates it is a grammatically correct and usable phrase.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "review for correctness" is a grammatically sound directive used across diverse fields to emphasize the importance of accuracy and quality control. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English. The phrase calls for a detailed examination of content or processes to identify and rectify errors, and ensure adherence to established standards. While versatile, clearly defining "correctness" criteria is crucial for consistent and objective evaluation. Alternatives like "verify for accuracy" or "assess for correctness" can be used depending on the specific context. Though examples are limited, the phrase's presence in academic, scientific, and professional contexts underscores its reliability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

assess for correctness

Similar to the original phrase, but uses "assess" to imply a more formal evaluation.

examine for accuracy

Uses "examine" to suggest a close and careful look to ensure correctness.

verify for accuracy

Focuses specifically on accuracy, implying a check against known standards.

check for validity

Emphasizes the authenticity and legitimacy of the information being reviewed.

audit for precision

Suggests a more formal and systematic examination, concentrating on exactness.

validate for truthfulness

Highlights the importance of confirming the honesty and veracity of the content.

evaluate for factualness

Highlights the assessment of whether the information aligns with verifiable facts.

scrutinize for errors

Implies a detailed and critical examination to identify mistakes or inaccuracies.

proofread for errors

Specifically targets typographical and grammatical mistakes.

inspect for flaws

Focuses on identifying imperfections or defects in the content or process.

FAQs

How can I use "review for correctness" in a sentence?

You might say, "We need to "review for correctness" before submitting the final report" or "The code was "reviewed for correctness" by a team of experts".

What is a good alternative to "review for correctness"?

Alternatives include "verify for accuracy", "check for validity", or "assess for correctness", depending on the specific context.

What does it mean to "review for correctness"?

To ""review for correctness"" means to examine something carefully to ensure that it is free from errors and aligns with established standards or facts.

What is the difference between "review for correctness" and "proofread for errors"?

"Review for correctness" is a broader term that includes verifying factual accuracy and adherence to standards, while "proofread for errors" typically focuses on identifying and correcting typographical and grammatical mistakes.