review for completeness

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'review for completeness' is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it in any situation where you want to indicate that one should review something to make sure that it is complete. For example: "Before submitting your application, please review for completeness to make sure you haven't missed anything."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Academia

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

2 human-written examples

Approximately 1 week post-race, the subjects were provided their race diet logs via electronic correspondence to review for completeness and accuracy.

Sports Medicine - Open

[ 9- 12] Two of these studies [ 9, 10] were included in a previous review [ 1] and data were re-extracted for this review for completeness.

BMC Infectious Diseases

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

These were self-completed and later reviewed for completeness and accuracy by trained interviewers during in-person interviews.

British Journal of Cancer

Following this process, a face-to-face discussion was held with all the respondents where completed questions were reviewed for completeness and accuracy.

Health Research Policy and Systems

Each completed subject survey form was reviewed for completeness prior to analysis by the principal investigator.

BMC Public Health

Upon completion of all the surveys, the data were reviewed for completeness and coded for entry into a database.

BMC Pediatrics

Once the AIMS survey is created, it will be reviewed for completeness, accuracy and utilization by study staff and expert reviewers.

BMC Women's Health

Received questionnaires were reviewed for completeness and patients were seen in clinic or contacted by telephone to complete missing items.

British Journal of Cancer

Abstracts will be reviewed for completeness and to ensure psychometric adequacy.

Columbia University

Once our applications have closed and all applications are reviewed for completeness, we open our application database to faculty who are interested in working with a student during the summer.

Harvard University

CRF was reviewed for completeness and consistency by authors VL and IT, who frequently perform and supervise thoracentesis.

Critical Ultrasound Journal

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "review for completeness", specify the criteria or standards against which completeness is being judged to provide context for the review.

Common error

Avoid vagueness by stating what "completeness" entails in your specific situation. For example, say "Review the document for completeness, ensuring all required fields are filled", rather than simply "Review the document for completeness."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "review for completeness" functions as a directive. It is used to instruct or recommend that something be examined to ensure it is whole and contains all the necessary parts. Ludwig AI indicates the phrase is correct and usable in written English. Examples from the search results show it used in academic and professional contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

65%

Academia

25%

News & Media

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "review for completeness" is a grammatically sound and functional phrase used to ensure that something is thoroughly examined to confirm that it contains all necessary elements. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is appropriate for use in both written and spoken English. Predominantly found in scientific and academic contexts, this phrase serves to emphasize thoroughness and accuracy by rectifying any potential oversights. When using the phrase, it's best practice to specify the criteria for completeness and avoid vagueness, thereby ensuring clarity in communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

check for thoroughness

Replaces "review" with "check" and "completeness" with "thoroughness", altering the specific wording while maintaining the core meaning.

verify its entirety

Substitutes "review" with "verify" and uses "entirety" instead of "completeness", shifting the focus to the whole rather than individual parts.

ensure it is comprehensive

Rephrases the request as an action to "ensure" comprehensiveness, changing the sentence structure and emphasis.

confirm all details are present

Focuses on confirming the presence of all details, offering a more specific interpretation of what constitutes completeness.

validate for full inclusion

Uses "validate" to mean review and specifies "full inclusion" to highlight that nothing is missing.

audit for exhaustive information

Replaces "review" with "audit" and "completeness" with "exhaustive information", suggesting a more rigorous and detailed examination.

scrutinize for omissions

Shifts the focus to identifying what is missing rather than confirming what is present, using "scrutinize" to imply careful examination.

assess its integral parts

Highlights the assessment of individual components to determine if they form a complete whole, changing the perspective slightly.

investigate whether anything is lacking

Presents the review as an investigation into potential deficiencies, altering the active voice and overall tone.

make sure it's all there

This is a more informal and direct way to express the same idea, suitable for less formal contexts.

FAQs

What does "review for completeness" mean?

It means to examine something carefully to ensure that all necessary parts or information are included and nothing is missing.

How can I use "review for completeness" in a sentence?

You can say, "Please "review for completeness" before submitting the report" or "The team will "review for completeness" of the application forms".

What is a more formal way to say "review for completeness"?

More formal alternatives include "verify its entirety" or "ensure it is comprehensive".

Is it better to say "review for completeness" or "check for accuracy"?

The choice depends on the context. "Review for completeness" focuses on ensuring nothing is missing, while "check for accuracy" emphasizes verifying the correctness of the information present.