review for accuracy

USAGE SUMMARY

"review for accuracy" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to reviewing something for accuracy or to ensure accuracy. For example: Before submitting the report, please review it for accuracy.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

9 human-written examples

However, the investigator acting as the Responsible Party must review for accuracy and make any necessary changes.

Harvard University

Law and accounting firms push the bulk of the work for smaller B2B clients to junior associates; partners perform only a cursory review for accuracy.

Harvard Business Review

As is true of any natural history collection database, however, the resulting "raw" information requires review for accuracy prior to use.

Evolution: Education and Outreach

So, for the debit card problem, for example: "1) Collect all customer data forms, 2) Review for accuracy and consistency, 3) Revise inconsistencies, etc., etc".

Huffington Post

Identified targets were confirmed by manual review for accuracy.

BMC Medical Genomics

Each transcription was subject to an additional review for accuracy by EO and EL.

BMJ Open

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

51 human-written examples

The ballots may then be reviewed for accuracy.

The New York Times

The customers reportedly filled in forms on a Web site, which were not reviewed for accuracy.

The New York Times

This information was reviewed for accuracy and then summarized.

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

To what degree do you think the information presented in those articles has been reviewed for accuracy and/or credibility?

The New York Times

Tax returns to be filed in the United States are reviewed for accuracy and completeness by HBP's Controller.

Harvard Business Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "review for accuracy", clearly define the criteria for accuracy to ensure a consistent and effective review process.

Common error

Avoid focusing solely on surface-level accuracy; ensure the information is also relevant and appropriate within its intended context.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "review for accuracy" functions primarily as a directive, indicating the need to carefully examine something to ensure its correctness. Ludwig AI confirms that the phrase is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

30%

News & Media

20%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Wiki

10%

Formal & Business

10%

Unknown/unmatched sources

10%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "review for accuracy" is a grammatically correct and usable phrase that serves as a directive to carefully examine something for correctness, as stated by Ludwig AI. With a professional register, it's found across diverse fields like science, news, academia, wiki, and business. To enhance clarity, defining the criteria for accuracy is a key best practice. While alternatives such as "check for correctness" or "verify for precision" exist, "review for accuracy" remains a clear and direct way to emphasize the importance of precision in written or spoken communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

check for correctness

Focuses more directly on the state of being correct rather than the act of reviewing.

verify for precision

Emphasizes the need for exactness and detail in the review process.

validate for truthfulness

Highlights ensuring that the information is factual and genuine.

scrutinize for flaws

Focuses on identifying errors or imperfections through careful examination.

audit for correctness

Suggests a formal and systematic examination to confirm accuracy.

assess for validity

Focuses on confirming the legitimacy and soundness of the information.

inspect for errors

Highlights the identification of mistakes through careful observation.

confirm for exactness

Underscores the need to verify that information is accurate and without discrepancies.

examine for reliability

Focuses on evaluating the consistency and dependability of the information.

re-evaluate for fidelity

Suggests a second look to ensure faithful representation of the original data.

FAQs

How can I use "review for accuracy" in a sentence?

You can use "review for accuracy" when you need to emphasize the importance of checking something to ensure it is correct. For example, "Before submitting the report, please "review for accuracy"".

What is another way to say "review for accuracy"?

Alternatives include "check for correctness", "verify for precision", or "validate for truthfulness" depending on the context.

What does it mean to "review for accuracy"?

To "review for accuracy" means to carefully examine something to ensure that it is free from errors and conforms to established standards or facts.

Why is it important to "review for accuracy"?

It is important to "review for accuracy" because errors can lead to misinterpretations, incorrect decisions, or even serious consequences. Ensuring accuracy enhances the reliability and credibility of information.