Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
review by
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "review by" is correct and usable in written English.
It is typically used to indicate that something is to be evaluated or assessed by a specific person or group. Example: "The final report will be submitted for review by the committee next week."
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Academia
Science
Alternative expressions(7)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
Review by Alessandra Stanley.
News & Media
Review by Seth Schiesel.
News & Media
Review by Roslyn Sulcas.
News & Media
Review by Dwight Garner.
News & Media
Review by Michiko Kakutani.
News & Media
Music Review by Zachary Woolfe.
News & Media
Review by MichikoKakutani.
News & Media
Review by Sophie Missing.
News & Media
Review by Rosie Birkett.
News & Media
Review by Eve O'Sullivan.
News & Media
A review by Cathy Horyn.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When attributing a review, always include the author's full name and publication to establish credibility. For example, "A review by Roger Ebert in the Chicago Sun-Times highlighted the film's innovative cinematography."
Common error
Avoid using the past tense when the review is current or ongoing. Instead of "A review by the committee analyzed the proposal last week", use "A review by the committee analyzes the proposal."
Source & Trust
90%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "review by" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun, typically to indicate the author or source of a review. It commonly appears in contexts where attribution and credibility are important. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable in written English.
Frequent in
News & Media
60%
Academia
20%
Science
10%
Less common in
Formal & Business
5%
Wiki
3%
Reference
2%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "review by" is a common and grammatically sound prepositional phrase used to attribute a review to a specific source. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is correct and usable. Its frequency is very common, with prominent usage in news, academic, and scientific contexts. The phrase serves to provide context and establish credibility. Alternatives include "assessment by" and "evaluation by". To ensure clarity, always include the author's full name and publication. Common errors involve incorrect verb tense, so use the present tense for current reviews. Using "review by" effectively enhances clarity and credibility in writing.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
assessment by
Focuses on the evaluation aspect rather than the overview.
evaluation by
Emphasizes the judgment and value assigned during the assessment.
analysis by
Highlights a detailed examination of the subject matter.
critique by
Implies a more critical and detailed evaluation.
inspection by
Suggests a close and careful examination of something.
examination by
Focuses on a thorough investigation or study.
report by
Indicates a formal written account after an evaluation.
study by
Highlights a research-oriented approach to the evaluation.
feedback from
Emphasizes input and response, rather than just evaluation.
commentary by
Suggests an informal or personal evaluation.
FAQs
How can I use "review by" in a sentence?
The phrase "review by" is used to indicate that a review or evaluation was conducted by a specific person or entity. For example, "The book received a positive "review by" The New York Times."
What are some alternatives to using "review by"?
Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "assessment by", "evaluation by", or "critique by". These phrases all suggest an appraisal or examination performed by someone.
Is it always necessary to specify who the review is by?
Specifying the source of the review adds credibility and context. Including ""review by" a renowned expert" can significantly influence the reader's perception.
What's the difference between "review by" and "reviewed by"?
"Review by" indicates who is conducting the review, whereas "reviewed by" is used in passive voice to describe the subject of the review. For example, "Review by John Smith" versus "The report was reviewed by the committee".
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
90%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested