responsible in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "responsible in" is grammatically correct and can be used in written English.
It is typically used to describe someone who is responsible or accountable for a particular task, action, or situation. Example: The marketing team is responsible in creating a new advertising campaign for the product launch.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

"Someone used to great responsibility, and responsible in his authority.

The Guardian - Books

The budget is responsible in other ways.

The New York Times

We felt responsible in taking Burns poem".

Independent

Maybe the G.O.P. was more responsible in those days.

The New York Times

I don't think designers are responsible in that way.

The New Yorker

Are we more responsible in deciding who can buy weapons?

The New York Times

You can be more responsible in how you approach it.

The New York Times

I think they would be responsible in the majority.

The New York Times

"To hold them responsible in this case is simply wrong".

The New York Times

It is certainly responsible, in part, for her extreme directness.

The New Yorker

Johnson says he feels responsible in two ways.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "responsible in", ensure the context clearly defines the area of responsibility. Be specific about what the person or entity is responsible for to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "responsible in" without specifying the area of responsibility. For example, instead of saying "They are responsible in the project", specify "They are responsible in managing the budget of the project".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "responsible in" functions as an adjective phrase that modifies a noun or pronoun, indicating a specific area or aspect of accountability or duty. It specifies the scope of responsibility, making the statement more precise. As confirmed by Ludwig, it is considered grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

59%

Formal & Business

17%

Science

14%

Less common in

Wiki

8%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "responsible in" is a grammatically correct and frequently used way to specify the scope of someone's accountability. As Ludwig AI confirms, it enhances clarity by defining the particular area or duty for which a person or entity is responsible. It is commonly found in news, business, and scientific contexts, making it a versatile choice for various communication needs. To ensure effective usage, always specify the area of responsibility to avoid ambiguity. While alternatives like "accountable for" or "in charge of" exist, "responsible in" provides a direct and precise way to express defined accountability.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

accountable for

Focuses on being held to account for actions or outcomes.

in charge of

Emphasizes having control or management over something.

liable for

Highlights legal or financial responsibility.

answerable to

Stresses the obligation to explain or justify actions to someone.

culpable in

Indicates blame or guilt in a particular situation.

instrumental in

Highlights the importance of someone or something in achieving a result.

involved in

Indicates participation or engagement in something.

tasked with

Emphasizes being given a specific duty or assignment.

trusted to

Highlights the aspect of confidence and delegation.

delegated for

Indicates that responsibility has been passed on for a specific purpose.

FAQs

How can I use "responsible in" in a sentence?

Use "responsible in" to indicate the area or aspect for which someone is accountable. For instance, "The project manager is responsible in ensuring timely delivery of the project milestones".

What's a good alternative to "responsible in"?

Depending on the context, alternatives like "accountable for", "in charge of", or "liable for" could be more appropriate.

Is it always necessary to specify what someone is "responsible in"?

Yes, specifying the area of responsibility is crucial for clarity. Without it, the statement can be too vague. Saying "He is responsible" lacks impact compared to "He is responsible in overseeing the quality control process".

How does "responsible in" differ from just saying "responsible"?

"Responsible" is a general term. "Responsible in" narrows down the scope, specifying the area of accountability. Using "responsible in" provides more context and precision to the statement.