requirements to be

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "requirements to be" is not correct in standard written English.
It may be intended to express conditions or criteria for something to exist or occur, but it lacks clarity and proper structure. Example: "The requirements to be eligible for the scholarship include a minimum GPA and a personal statement."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

That's one of the requirements to be successful.

The New York Times

WHAT are the requirements to be able to participate?

The New York Times

Requirements to be satisfied by the sensor are also analysed.

Measurement

Qualified dividends are ordinary dividends that meet the requirements to be taxed as net capital gains.

The Guardian

The dye used depends on the type of material and the specific requirements to be met.

Encyclopedia Britannica

On the experimental side, the requirements to be met by the equipment are severe.

Encyclopedia Britannica

What are the minimum requirements to be considered for graduate admission?

University of California, Berkeley

The central processor then must idle, waiting for some program's I 0 requirements to be satisfied.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

He successfully satisfied the competitive requirements to be admitted as a PhD student.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The Special Master found their annual requirements to be 1,072,514 acre feet.

Cornell University

The program is structured to permit course requirements to be completed in four years.

Yale University

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer using more direct and grammatically sound alternatives such as "criteria for", "requirements for", or "qualifications for" to enhance clarity and professionalism in your writing. For example, instead of saying "the requirements to be considered", opt for "the criteria for consideration".

Common error

Avoid adding unnecessary words when simpler constructions are more effective. Phrases like "requirements to be" often add extra length without adding meaning. Directly state the requirements with a preposition like "for" or use a noun followed by a gerund. For example, use "requirements for eligibility" rather than "requirements to be eligible."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "requirements to be" functions as a prepositional phrase intended to introduce a description of mandatory or necessary criteria. However, it's often grammatically awkward and can be replaced by clearer alternatives. According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is not correct in standard written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

36%

News & Media

33%

Academia

18%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

3%

Wiki

3%

Formal & Business

7%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

While the phrase "requirements to be" is frequently used across various contexts, Ludwig AI analysis indicates it is grammatically awkward and not considered correct in standard written English. As such, it is advisable to replace it with clearer and more direct alternatives such as "criteria for", "qualifications for", or "requirements for". Usage is common in science, news media, and academic writing. By opting for more precise phrasing, you can enhance the clarity and professionalism of your writing. Understanding these nuances allows for more effective communication across different domains. Remember, precision in language enhances credibility and prevents misinterpretations.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

criteria for

Replaces the infinitive with a direct specification of criteria.

prerequisites for

Highlights what is required beforehand.

necessary conditions

Focuses on the conditions that are essential.

requisites for

Emphasizes the items or qualities needed.

needed qualifications

Emphasizes the qualifications that are necessary.

demands for

Stresses the demands or expectations to be met.

mandatory aspects

Emphasizes the obligatory nature of the requirements.

essential elements

Highlights the essential components or aspects.

stipulations for

Focuses on specific conditions or agreements.

provisions for

Highlights the necessary preparations or arrangements.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "requirements to be" for better clarity?

Consider using alternatives such as "criteria for", "qualifications for", or "requirements for" followed by the specific condition or action. This makes the sentence more direct and easier to understand.

What are common replacements for "requirements to be" in formal writing?

In formal contexts, phrases like "necessary conditions", "essential elements", or "mandatory aspects" can replace "requirements to be". These alternatives provide a more professional and precise tone.

Is "requirements to be" grammatically correct?

While frequently used, "requirements to be" is grammatically awkward. It's better to opt for clearer and more direct alternatives like "requirements for" or "criteria for".

What's the difference between "requirements to be" and "requirements for"?

"Requirements for" is grammatically more conventional and direct. It specifies what is needed without the infinitive "to be", making it clearer and more concise. For example, "requirements for application" is preferable to "requirements to be applied".