requirements mentioned

USAGE SUMMARY

"requirements mentioned" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it when referring to the requirements of something that have already been mentioned in another part of the text. For example, "We need to ensure that all of the requirements mentioned are met before moving forward".

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

38 human-written examples

For measuring allelic imbalance in imprinted genes, all the filtering and requirements mentioned above were applied except we did not require that both SNP alleles are seen.

eLife

For the requirements mentioned above, a new kind of photodiode detector is being developed.

Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment

Existing solutions do not fulfill our goal while ensuring the requirements mentioned above.

Journal of Internet Services and Applications

To meet the requirements mentioned above, the mechanical performance of the connecting element is very important.

International Journal of Coal Science & Technology

Each of the storage systems is sized according to the requirements mentioned above.

European Transport Research Review

The results show that the machine is capable of following the perquisite requirements mentioned in the ASTM standard.

Procedia Engineering

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

22 human-written examples

Most countries with requirements mention bioequivalence, but few required bioavailability studies explicitly.

Applied Health Economics and Health Policy

The federal requirement, mentioned briefly in a presidential directive issued in February, will be detailed in the Department of Homeland Security's National Response Plan, which is still being formulated, according to Josh Filler, the director of state and local government coordination for the new federal agency.

The New York Times

Justifications for the publicity requirement mentioned above do not suffice to provide grounds to establish the need to guarantee the mutual assurance among citizens that such public rules are effectively complied with, and known to be so.[72] This just gives an idea of how wide the scope of the publicity requirement may be in Rawls's own work and how diverse its justifications are.

SEP

Unfortunately, ALLPATHS-LG (Gnetre et al., 2011) could not be included, because of its small-fragment library requirement mentioned in Section 1.

Bioinformatics

The group of journals published by Open Access publishers (n = 13) offered the most guidance to their authors: the Uniform Requirements were mentioned by ten journals (77%), while trial registration was required or recommended by eight (62%).

BMC Pediatrics

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "requirements mentioned", ensure the requirements have been clearly defined earlier in the text to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "requirements mentioned" if the requirements haven't been explicitly stated. Instead, directly state the requirements or use a more specific phrase like "as-yet unstated requirements."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "requirements mentioned" functions as a noun phrase, modifying a noun (e.g., "solution", "plan") by specifying which requirements are being referred to, based on previous mention. Ludwig AI confirms it is a correct and usable phrase in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

70%

Formal & Business

15%

News & Media

15%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "requirements mentioned" is a grammatically sound and usable phrase, primarily employed to refer to requirements previously detailed in a text. Ludwig AI affirms its correctness and usability. While not exceedingly common, it finds frequent application in scientific, formal, and business contexts, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples. To enhance clarity, ensure the requirements have been explicitly stated. Alternatives such as "stated requirements" or "specified requirements" offer similar meanings and can be used based on nuances. As such, using this expression properly will ensure the message is easily understood.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

stated requirements

Replaces "mentioned" with "stated", implying a more formal declaration of the requirements.

specified requirements

Uses "specified" instead of "mentioned", suggesting that the requirements are clearly defined.

aforementioned requirements

Substitutes "mentioned" with "aforementioned", indicating that the requirements were discussed earlier.

previously mentioned requirements

Adds "previously" to emphasize that the requirements were discussed before.

noted requirements

Uses "noted" as a synonym for "mentioned", implying that the requirements were observed or recorded.

outlined requirements

Replaces "mentioned" with "outlined", suggesting a structured presentation of the requirements.

listed requirements

Substitutes "mentioned" with "listed", indicating that the requirements are presented in a list format.

detailed requirements

Uses "detailed" to show that there is a deeper overview of the requirements.

discussed requirements

Replaces "mentioned" with "discussed", suggesting the requirements were debated or talked about.

identified requirements

Substitutes "mentioned" with "identified", indicating there was a process that discovered the requirements.

FAQs

How to use "requirements mentioned" in a sentence?

You can use "requirements mentioned" to refer back to a set of requirements that have already been introduced in the text. For example, "The proposed solution addresses all the "requirements mentioned" in the previous section".

What can I say instead of "requirements mentioned"?

Alternatives to "requirements mentioned" include "stated requirements", "specified requirements", or "aforementioned requirements" depending on the context.

Is it appropriate to use "requirements mentioned above" in formal writing?

Yes, "requirements mentioned above" is appropriate for formal writing as long as the requirements have indeed been previously mentioned in the text. Be mindful of clarity and precision.

What's the difference between "requirements mentioned" and "requirements cited"?

"Requirements mentioned" implies that the requirements were referred to within the current context, while "requirements cited" suggests the requirements were quoted or referenced from an external source.