Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

requirements for all

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "requirements for all" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing criteria or standards that apply universally to a group or population. Example: "The new policy outlines the requirements for all employees to ensure a safe and productive work environment."

✓ Grammatically correct

Academia

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Mr. Geithner said the government would demand higher capital requirements for all the participants.

News & Media

The New York Times

You can justly blame poorly defined requirements for all these problems.

For simplicity, we chose a two-director configuration (directivity of 114), which already satisfied the requirements for all the considered applications.

Science & Research

Nature

At most L loop are required to check whether the transmission rate requirements for all traffic are met.

§ 51.230 Requirements for all plans.

§ 119.35 Certificate application requirements for all operators.

(ii) These parameters are the basic requirements for all sites.

What are the minimum requirements for all CS applicants?

Requirements for all earned degrees beyond the bachelor's degree.

The department recently published bare-bones requirements for all newly hired screeners.

"When Ecuador removed visa requirements for all nationalities, it became a major entry point for traffickers".

News & Media

The Guardian
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "requirements for all", ensure that the requirements genuinely apply to every member of the group without exceptions. State any specific exceptions clearly to avoid misinterpretations.

Common error

Avoid assuming that the "requirements for all" are universally understood. Clearly define each requirement to prevent ambiguity and ensure consistent application across the board.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "requirements for all" primarily functions as a determiner phrase specifying that certain conditions or standards apply universally to every member of a designated group. Ludwig confirms its proper and usable form.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Academia

32%

News & Media

32%

Science

29%

Less common in

Formal & Business

5%

Wiki

2%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "requirements for all" is a commonly used phrase that indicates mandatory conditions or standards applicable to every member of a group. According to Ludwig, the phrase is grammatically correct and widely used across various contexts, including academia, news, and science. To ensure clear communication, it is essential to define the requirements explicitly and avoid overgeneralization. Alternatives such as "universal standards" or "general provisions" may be used in more formal settings. Overall, understanding the appropriate usage of "requirements for all" helps maintain clarity and consistency in communication.

FAQs

How can I use "requirements for all" in a sentence?

You can use "requirements for all" to specify conditions or standards that everyone must meet. For example: "The new safety guidelines outline the "requirements for all" personnel working on the construction site."

What is a more formal alternative to "requirements for all"?

In a formal context, you could use phrases like "universal standards", "general provisions", or "mandatory criteria" as alternatives to "requirements for all".

Are "requirements for all" and "requirements for each" the same?

While both phrases address requirements, "requirements for all" emphasizes that the requirements apply collectively to a group, whereas "requirements for each" focuses on the individual responsibilities of each member within that group. The first one is more about the group and the second is more about each individual.

What's the difference between ""requirements for all"" and "minimum requirements"?

"Requirements for all" implies a set of criteria that everyone must meet, regardless of their role or status. "Minimum requirements", on the other hand, denote the lowest acceptable standards that must be achieved, but there could be more requirements applicable.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

86%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: