requirements are valid

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "requirements are valid" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the legitimacy or acceptance of certain requirements in a project or process. Example: "Before we proceed, we need to ensure that all requirements are valid and meet the necessary standards."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

1 human-written examples

For location-based services, the same requirements are valid: a cheap technology in combination with a simple deployment strategy avoiding complex and time-consuming manual configuration and calibration procedures.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

58 human-written examples

These new requirements were valid in 2016/2017 as well.

International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education

Flowdown and boilerplate are valid requirement-analysis strategies.

System Verification Proving the Design Solution Satisfies the Requirements

In the absence of a 'gold-standard' for repeated-sprint testing for instance, coaching teams should adjust sprint distances, frequency, recovery time/type according to their players and sport requirements, ensuring that the tests are valid and reliable.

British Journal of Sports Medicine

Given all this evidence, we conclude that both Z1 and Z2 satisfy all requirements to be valid instruments for the identification of the LATEs we want to estimate via Equations (1) and (2).

IZA Journal of Labor Policy

There are valid criticisms.

The New York Times

These concerns are valid.

The New York Times

These are valid criticisms.

The Guardian

Both are valid".

The New York Times - Magazine

These suspicions are valid".

The New York Times

All are valid explanations.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "requirements are valid", clearly define what the requirements are and the criteria for their validity. This provides context and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid stating that "requirements are valid" without specifying the scope or context of their validity. Ensure that the conditions under which the requirements are valid are clearly defined.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "requirements are valid" functions as a statement of affirmation or confirmation. It asserts that certain conditions, rules, or needs (requirements) meet the necessary criteria for acceptance, accuracy, or applicability (valid). Ludwig AI confirms this usage.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

Science

40%

News & Media

30%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Encyclopedias

5%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "requirements are valid" is a grammatically correct and frequently employed expression that communicates the legitimacy, accuracy, or applicability of specific criteria. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is suitable for use in various contexts, particularly within scientific, news, and technical domains. To enhance clarity, it's essential to clearly define the requirements and the scope of their validity. Alternatives like "requirements are legitimate" or "requirements are sound" can be used depending on the desired nuance. Be mindful of overgeneralizing the validity without context, and always provide clear conditions for the requirements being deemed valid.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

requirements are legitimate

Replaces "valid" with "legitimate", emphasizing the lawfulness or permissibility of the requirements.

requirements are sound

Substitutes "valid" with "sound", highlighting the reasonableness and good judgment behind the requirements.

requirements are justified

Uses "justified" instead of "valid", stressing that there is a good reason for the requirements.

requirements are acceptable

Replaces "valid" with "acceptable", indicating that the requirements are satisfactory or allowable.

requirements are accurate

Substitutes "valid" with "accurate", focusing on the correctness and precision of the requirements.

requirements are applicable

Uses "applicable" instead of "valid", suggesting that the requirements are relevant and suitable for the specific situation.

requirements are well-founded

Replaces "valid" with "well-founded", highlighting that the requirements are based on solid reasoning or evidence.

requirements hold true

Substitutes "are valid" with "hold true", emphasizing the endurance and reliability of the requirements.

requirements are in effect

Uses "are in effect" instead of "are valid", stressing that the requirements are currently operative and binding.

requirements are in force

Replaces "are valid" with "are in force", suggesting that the requirements are currently active and legally binding.

FAQs

What does it mean when we say "requirements are valid"?

When we say "requirements are valid", we mean that the specified conditions, rules, or criteria are legitimate, justified, and applicable within a particular context. It implies that the requirements are well-founded and can be relied upon.

How can I verify if "requirements are valid"?

To verify if "requirements are valid", you need to check if they align with established standards, regulations, or the specific needs of the project or situation. Evidence or justification should support their legitimacy and relevance.

What are some alternatives to saying "requirements are valid"?

You can use alternatives such as "requirements are legitimate", "requirements are sound", or "requirements are justified" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use the phrase "requirements are valid"?

The phrase "requirements are valid" is suitable in contexts where you need to assert the legitimacy, accuracy, or applicability of certain conditions or criteria, such as in project management, legal discussions, or scientific research.