requirement with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "requirement with" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It may be intended to describe a specific requirement associated with something, but it lacks clarity and proper context. Example: "The requirement with the project specifications needs to be clarified."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

She is fighting a legal battle over that requirement with the help of the ACLU.

The Guardian

Some California companies will meet the new storage requirement with ice systems, he said.

The New York Times

"Is it a requirement with baseball that we be at 189? No, it's not a requirement.

The New York Times - Sports

The law also introduced a strict voter ID requirement, with the anticipated effect of suppressing Democratic votes even further.

The Guardian

The federation said it would discuss whether Armstrong had met that requirement with the United States Anti-Doping Agency.

The New York Times

All of the finalists met that requirement with a separate space or marker for each of the victims.

The New York Times - Arts

But Hip Gear, a company that makes game controllers and accessories, has now eliminated that requirement with its Hip Screenpad, a controller with a built-in screen.

The New York Times - Tech

Among the findings in its report, which was released yesterday, the committee said it was no longer sufficient to satisfy the science requirement with broad-based survey courses.

The New York Times

On Tuesday night, the Legislature voted 8 to 7 against the requirement, with all six Republicans and two Democrats voting no, and seven Democrats voting yes.

The New York Times

Harkin leads the majoritarians, who would replace the sixty-vote requirement with a fifty-one-vote requirement, while still trying to protect the minority's right to force debate.

The New Yorker

A voter can satisfy this requirement with a photo identification card, a utility bill, a bank statement, a paycheck, or a government document showing name and address.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Prefer using more grammatically correct alternatives such as "requirement for" or "requirement of" to improve clarity and avoid misinterpretations.

Common error

Avoid using "with" after "requirement" when "for" or "of" is more appropriate. The preposition "with" often implies accompaniment or association, which is not the intended meaning when specifying what something is required for or of.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "requirement with" functions as a noun followed by a preposition, typically intending to specify a condition or necessity related to something. However, Ludwig AI indicates that this is not correct, "requirement for" or "requirement regarding" should be preferred.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

44%

News & Media

42%

Formal & Business

14%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "requirement with" appears frequently in various contexts, particularly in science and news media, it is generally considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI suggests that "requirement for" or "requirement regarding" are better alternatives to use. It's essential to use more precise and standard English formulations, such as "requirement for" or "requirement of", to enhance clarity and avoid potential misinterpretations. Sticking to grammatically sound alternatives ensures effective and accurate communication.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

requirement for

Replaces 'with' with 'for' to indicate the object the requirement applies to, improving grammatical correctness and clarity.

requirement of

Uses 'of' to specify the source or nature of the requirement, offering a more formal and precise alternative.

necessary for

Focuses on the necessity aspect of a requirement, shifting the emphasis slightly while maintaining a similar meaning.

need for

Replaces 'requirement' with 'need', providing a simpler and more direct way to express the same concept.

prerequisite for

Emphasizes the condition that must be met before something else can happen, changing the nuance slightly.

demand for

Highlights the aspect of something being demanded or insisted upon, altering the focus of the statement.

condition for

Replaces 'requirement' with 'condition', stressing that something must be in place to achieve a certain result.

standard for

Emphasizes that it's a standard to comply to, and not simply a "requirement".

criteria for

Highlights the criteria to respect to achieve a certain result, slightly changing the scope.

rule for

Emphasizes that it's a rule to comply to, and not simply a "requirement".

FAQs

What is the correct way to use "requirement" in a sentence?

The word "requirement" is often followed by prepositions like "for" or "of". For example, instead of "requirement with", use "requirement "for"" or "requirement "of"" depending on the context.

What can I say instead of "requirement with"?

You can use alternatives like "requirement "for"", "requirement "of"", or "need for" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "requirement with" or "requirement for"?

"Requirement "for"" is generally the correct and preferred usage. "Requirement with" is not grammatically correct in most contexts.

What's the difference between "requirement for" and "requirement of"?

"Requirement "for"" specifies what something is needed for, while "requirement "of"" specifies the source or nature of the requirement. For example: "The requirement for the project is clarity." vs. "The requirement of the law is compliance."