requirement of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "requirement of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to something that is necessary or expected. For example, "The requirement of the job is for the applicant to have at least 5 years of experience."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"This is a requirement of Islam.

The New Yorker

There is no requirement of "unbearable suffering".

The Economist

Such a declaration is a requirement of the law.

The New York Times

Pain tolerance is an essential requirement of his profession.

The New Yorker

This is the first requirement of the plan itself.

The New York Times

The requirement of equal payment exempts consulting and employment arrangements.

The New York Times

The second requirement of a good biography is vivid detail.

The New York Times - Books

They are a requirement of the 2003 Communications Act.

The Guardian

"They did not comport with the requirement of the law".

The New York Times

They absolve the student from the requirement of thinking.

The New York Times

Endurance is the unseen requirement of a successful candidate.

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "requirement of", ensure that the noun following 'of' is specific and clearly defines what is required. For instance, instead of 'the requirement of something', specify 'the requirement of a valid passport'.

Common error

Avoid using "requirement of" excessively in lengthy sentences, as it can make the writing seem convoluted. Break down complex ideas into simpler sentences for clarity.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "requirement of" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun, specifying a necessary condition or attribute. It indicates what is needed or essential. Ludwig AI confirms its correct usage in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

43%

Science

24%

Encyclopedias

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Wiki

5%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "requirement of" is a versatile and grammatically correct way to express necessity or obligation, as confirmed by Ludwig AI. It's widely used across various domains, including news, science, and encyclopedias. While highly functional, it's essential to ensure clarity by specifying what exactly is required. Remember to avoid overuse in overly complex sentences. Consider using alternatives like "criterion of" or "necessity of" for variety. By following these guidelines, you can effectively incorporate the phrase "requirement of" into your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

criterion of

Focuses on a standard or test that something must meet.

regulation of

Indicates a rule or directive governing something.

necessity of

Highlights the essential nature or indispensability of something.

demand of

Emphasizes what is urgently needed or requested.

obligation of

Stresses a legal or moral duty to do something.

condition of

Highlights something that is essential for something else to happen.

stipulation of

Denotes a specific condition that must be met.

provision of

Implies a specific term or condition within an agreement.

prerequisite of

Signifies something required as a prior condition.

imperative of

Underscores the critical and urgent nature of a need.

FAQs

How can I use "requirement of" in a sentence?

Use "requirement of" to specify a necessary condition or attribute. For example, "Meeting the deadline is a "requirement of" the project".

What are some alternatives to "requirement of"?

Alternatives include "criterion of", "regulation of", or "necessity of", which can be used depending on the specific context.

Which is more appropriate: "requirement of" or "requirement for"?

While both are valid, "requirement of" is often used when specifying an attribute or condition, whereas "requirement for" is more frequently used when indicating what something is needed for. For example, "the requirement of a license" versus "the requirement for additional staff".

How does the formality of "requirement of" compare to its alternatives?

"Requirement of" is generally suitable for formal and neutral contexts. Less formal alternatives might include "need for" or "must-have for", depending on the situation.