requirement in

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "requirement in" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing a specific condition or necessity related to a particular context or subject. Example: "The requirement in the job description states that candidates must have at least five years of experience."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

fleet-wide requirement in 2016.

The New York Times

Mr. Shelley cited a requirement in the State Constitution.

The New York Times

Adam was condemned to appreciate the work requirement in welfare.

The New Yorker

There is no such requirement in the new Medicare guidelines.

The New York Times - Health

Airlines evidently met the requirement in a last-minute push.

The New York Times

It's a basic requirement in any sort of negotiation.

The Guardian - Music

This is a reasonable requirement in this country.

The Guardian

Few learned English, a requirement in South Korean schools.

The New York Times

The two-year requirement in this case is particularly egregious.

The New York Times

Connecticut adopted a parent safety class requirement in 2008.

The New York Times

7. What is your minimum requirement in a mate?

The New Yorker

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "requirement in", ensure that the context clearly specifies where or what the requirement applies to. For example, instead of saying 'There is a requirement', specify 'There is a "requirement in" the contract for...'.

Common error

Avoid using the passive voice when clarity is paramount. Instead of stating 'A requirement is present in', opt for the active voice: 'The regulation includes a "requirement in" section 3.2'.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "requirement in" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a noun or verb. It specifies the context or domain where a particular requirement is applicable. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and usable status.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Science

32%

Formal & Business

14%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "requirement in" is a versatile prepositional phrase used to pinpoint the specific area or context to which a particular requirement applies. Ludwig AI confirms it is a correct and usable phrase. It's commonly found in news, scientific, and formal business contexts. When using "requirement in", clarity is key: specify exactly where the requirement is applicable. Consider alternatives like "condition for" or "necessity in" to add nuance. The phrase maintains a mostly neutral register, leaning towards professional and formal. Therefore "requirement in" is a functional phrase to use in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

imperative in

Highlights the urgency or essential nature of the requirement within a particular situation.

necessity in

Focuses on the indispensable nature of the condition within the specific domain.

prerequisite for

Highlights the phrase as a necessary condition that must be met before something else can occur.

need for

Underscores the lack or deficiency that the requirement aims to fulfill.

stipulation in

Implies a specific condition that has been agreed upon as part of an arrangement.

condition for

Emphasizes the element as a prerequisite or stipulation rather than a general necessity.

demand within

Suggests a formal request or expectation that must be satisfied within a framework.

provision within

Focuses on an explicit term or condition included within a larger agreement or document.

criterion for

Highlights the element as a standard or principle used for assessment or judgment.

qualification for

Implies a specific skill, knowledge, or attribute necessary to fulfill a role or task.

FAQs

How do I properly use "requirement in" in a sentence?

Use "requirement in" to specify a condition or necessity within a particular context, like 'The key "requirement in" this project is adherence to the timeline'.

What's a good alternative to "requirement in"?

Consider alternatives such as "condition for" or "imperative in" depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "requirements of" instead of "requirement in"?

While both are grammatically correct, "requirement in" typically refers to a specific stipulation within a broader context, whereas "requirements of" refers to demands imposed by something. For example, 'The "requirement in" the policy is annual training' versus 'The requirements of the job are extensive'.

Can "requirement in" be used interchangeably with "need for"?

Not always. "Need for" generally indicates a deficiency or lack that must be addressed, while "requirement in" specifies a mandatory condition or stipulation. Using "need for" might soften the mandatory sense of "requirement in".