required to have

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "required to have" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when specifying a necessity or obligation to possess something. Example: "All applicants are required to have a valid driver's license to be considered for the position."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Second, everyone is required to have coverage.

The Washington Post

Senators are not required to have blind trusts.

The New York Times

But regional managers are not required to have medical training.

The Guardian

The authority is required to have a balanced budget.

The New York Times

Additionally, each bar was required to have separate memberships.

The Guardian

All members are required to have some income.

The Guardian

Everybody in my family is required to have a degree".

The New York Times

Children would be required to have health insurance.

The New York Times

Divers are required to have an open-water certification card.

The New York Times - Travel

Maybe it would be required to have regional approval".

The New York Times

United States banks are already required to have such controls.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "required to have", ensure that the context clearly specifies who or what is subject to the requirement. For example, "All employees are required to have a valid ID badge."

Common error

Avoid using "required to have" in overly passive constructions that obscure the subject of the requirement. Instead of "It is required to have a license", specify who needs the license: "All drivers are required to have a license".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "required to have" functions as an infinitive phrase expressing obligation or necessity. It indicates that something is not optional but is a mandatory condition. This is supported by Ludwig AI, which validates its grammatical correctness. Many examples illustrate its role in specifying conditions for individuals or entities.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Academia

32%

Science

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

4%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "required to have" is a grammatically sound and frequently used infinitive phrase that expresses obligation or necessity. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and the numerous examples highlight its versatility across various domains. The phrase is particularly common in formal contexts such as news, academia, and scientific writing, making it a valuable tool for precise and informative communication. Remembering to clarify the subject of the requirement and avoiding overly passive constructions will enhance clarity and effectiveness when using this phrase.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

obligated to possess

Replaces "required" with "obligated" and "have" with "possess", emphasizing a duty or obligation.

must possess

Uses "must" to indicate a requirement and "possess" instead of "have", providing a more formal tone.

need to have

Replaces "required" with "need", indicating necessity but with a slightly less formal tone.

necessary to possess

Uses "necessary" instead of "required" and "possess" instead of "have", conveying a sense of essentiality.

essential to have

Emphasizes the importance of having something by using "essential" in place of "required".

legally obliged to have

Adds the legal aspect to the obligation of having something, indicating it is a law or regulation.

compulsory to have

Replaces "required" with "compulsory", highlighting the mandatory nature of having something.

expected to possess

Indicates that having something is an expectation or standard, rather than a strict requirement.

are duty-bound to have

Uses the phrase "duty-bound" to convey a strong moral or ethical obligation.

demand to possess

Indicates a strong necessity to have something.

FAQs

How can I use "required to have" in a sentence?

Use "required to have" to indicate a necessary condition or obligation. For instance, "All students are "required to have" health insurance" or "Applicants are "required to have" prior experience".

What are some alternatives to "required to have"?

Alternatives include "must possess", "need to have", or "obligated to possess". The best choice depends on the specific context and desired level of formality. For example, in formal settings, "obligated to possess" might be more appropriate.

Is there a difference between "required to have" and "need to have"?

While both phrases indicate necessity, "required to have" often implies a rule or regulation, whereas "need to have" can simply indicate a practical necessity. "All employees are "required to have" security clearance" suggests a formal policy, while "I need to have more information" expresses a personal requirement.

When is it best to use "required to have" versus "must have"?

"Required to have" is often used in formal or official contexts, while "must have" can be more informal. If you're stating a rule or regulation, "required to have" is generally preferable. In casual conversation, "must have" might be more natural.