Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

required to explain

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "required to explain" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when indicating that someone has an obligation or necessity to provide an explanation for something. Example: "The student is required to explain their reasoning during the presentation."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

A bit of municipal history is required to explain.

News & Media

The New York Times

No longer is the God hypothesis required to explain the intricate complexity of the living world.

However, additional factors are required to explain the weaker fluorescence observed for AB# and ABCD -L609R.

Science & Research

Nature

A very broad perspective is required to explain the history of today's Islamic world.

Encyclopedias

Britannica

A new paradigm is required to explain patterns of competitive success and failure in information technology.

An identification of further redox processes is required to explain the high degree of radical scavenging.

Science

Polymer

No mystical, unobservable, unmeasurable, unfalsifiable, dark occult properties are required to explain any of it.

A more complex model is required to explain the recorded Eurasian archaeological cultural mosaic.

He will be required to explain any deposits that raise eyebrows.

Required to explain the bankruptcy in court filings, HCR ManorCare began its narrative with the sale-leaseback deal.

Therefore, further studies are required to explain these findings deeply.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "required to explain", ensure that the subject who is doing the explaining and the object being explained are clearly defined in your sentence for maximum clarity.

Common error

Avoid using "required to explain" in overly passive constructions that obscure who is responsible for the explanation. Active voice often makes your writing more direct and engaging.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "required to explain" functions as an infinitive phrase, often serving as an adjectival modifier describing a noun or pronoun that is obligated to provide an explanation. As Ludwig AI shows, the phrase is versatile and appears across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

43%

News & Media

38%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

5%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "required to explain" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression that denotes an obligation to provide an explanation. According to Ludwig AI, it appears predominantly in scientific and news contexts, carrying a neutral to formal tone. While alternatives like "obliged to clarify" or "needed to elaborate" exist, the specific choice depends on the desired nuance. It's crucial to use this phrase in active voice to maintain clarity and avoid ambiguity. With a high expert rating and widespread usage, mastering this phrase enhances effective communication across diverse domains.

FAQs

How can I use "required to explain" in a sentence?

You can use "required to explain" to indicate an obligation or necessity to provide an explanation. For example: "The defendant is required to explain his actions".

What are some alternatives to "required to explain"?

Alternatives include "obliged to clarify", "needed to elaborate", or "necessary to explicate", depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "require to explain" instead of "required to explain"?

No, "require to explain" is grammatically incorrect. The correct form is "required to explain", using the past participle of "require".

What is the difference between "required to explain" and "asked to explain"?

"Required to explain" implies an obligation or necessity, while "asked to explain" simply means a request has been made. You are "required to explain" something if it is expected of you, but you are only asked if someone wants you to.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: