require with

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "require with" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is not typically used in standard English, and its intended meaning is unclear without additional context. Example: "We require with the necessary documentation to process your application." (This sentence is awkward and unclear.)

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

21 human-written examples

"I was trying to imagine actually having the conversation the law appears to require with a woman," Davis said.

The Guardian

And Ms. Herring is struggling to raise the $4.5 million the transition will require, with little help from the federal government and none from the state.

The New York Times

"I think there's actually a pretty good awareness of what our sanctions prohibit and require with respect to Iran," the official said.

The New York Times

Mr. Camp could settle only on a tax code overhaul that raises the additional revenue Democrats require with approval from Mr. Boehner and his Republican colleagues.

The New York Times

Then why not enter my annual Observer Wine Quiz and give yourself a chance to win £300-worth of wine from Waitrose, chosen (if you require) with my help and advice.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

But prison teachers say they are not adequately resourced or staffed to provide the level of teaching prisoners require, with many suffering from complex social and mental health issues.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

38 human-written examples

How much more water is required with chemical farming?

The New York Times

The cautious approaches, the tender intimations of feeling required with Jacqui were out the window.

The New Yorker

But Sheik Ahmed would not confirm that, saying only, "He's required with different cases".

The New York Times

Protective clothing was not required with the use of Anvil, however.

The New York Times

No dams are required, with their many environmental problems, especially to fish and other wildlife.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "require with". Opt for clearer alternatives like "require along with" or "require in conjunction with" to ensure grammatical correctness and clear communication.

Common error

Do not assume that "with" can always directly follow "require". "Require" typically needs a more specific preposition or phrase to connect it to the associated element. For instance, instead of saying "We require with the necessary documentation", say "We "require along with" the necessary documentation."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "require with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect, functioning ambiguously within a sentence. Ludwig AI indicates that it's not a standard English construction. Examples show it used in varied contexts, but these uses are typically better served by more precise phrasing.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

35%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

5%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "require with" is generally deemed grammatically incorrect and lacks clarity in standard English. As Ludwig AI points out, this phrase is not a typical English construction. Although examples can be found across various contexts including News & Media and Science, its usage is inconsistent and often ambiguous. For clear and effective communication, it's best to substitute "require with" with more precise alternatives like ""require along with"", "require together with", or "require in conjunction with". These alternatives ensure grammatical correctness and enhance the overall clarity of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

require along with

Uses "along with" to clearly indicate that something is needed in addition to something else.

require together with

Emphasizes the need for two things to be present or considered at the same time.

require in conjunction with

Replaces "with" with a more formal and precise prepositional phrase indicating simultaneous need.

require in addition to

Specifies that something is needed as an extra component or element.

require and also

Uses a conjunction to add something extra.

require accompanied by

Suggests the idea of being required as a companion, or adjunct to something else.

require including

Specifies that the requirement includes something.

require supplemented by

Implies needing something extra to complete the original need.

require facilitated by

Specifies that the requirement must have the presence of something

require supported by

Suggests that the requirement relies on another.

FAQs

How to avoid using "require with"?

Instead of "require with", use more grammatically correct and clear alternatives such as ""require along with"", "require together with", or "require in conjunction with".

Is "require with" grammatically correct?

No, "require with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect. It's better to use phrases like ""require along with"" or "require in addition to" for clarity.

What can I say instead of "require with"?

You can use alternatives like ""require along with"", "require together with", or "require in conjunction with depending on the context.

Which is correct, "require with" or "require along with"?

"Require along with" is the correct and preferred usage. "Require with" is generally considered grammatically incorrect.