Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

representatives for

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "representatives for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when referring to individuals or entities that act on behalf of another person or organization, typically in a professional or formal context. Example: "The representatives for the company will be attending the conference to discuss potential partnerships."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Representatives for both funds declined to comment.

News & Media

The New York Times

Representatives for the candidates still held rallies.

News & Media

The New York Times

Representatives for UBS declined to comment.

News & Media

The New York Times

Press representatives for Lincoln Center declined to comment.

News & Media

The New York Times

Representatives for Tesla declined to comment further.

So did representatives for HBO and Showtime.

Representatives for Mr. Bronfman had no comment.

News & Media

The New York Times

Representatives for Groupon and the S.E.C. declined to comment.

News & Media

The New York Times

Representatives for BMG and Sony declined to comment.

News & Media

The New York Times

Representatives for the firms declined to comment on the inquiry.

News & Media

The New York Times

Representatives for Universal, EMI and BMG all declined to comment.

News & Media

The New York Times
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "representatives for", ensure the context clearly indicates who or what is being represented. For instance, specify the organization or individual the representatives are acting on behalf of to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "representative for" when referring to multiple individuals. "Representatives for" is the correct plural form. Using the singular form implies only one person is acting on behalf of the entity.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "representatives for" functions as a noun phrase acting as a determiner, indicating individuals or entities authorized to act or speak on behalf of someone or something. According to Ludwig, this phrase is correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Formal & Business

17%

Science

15%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "representatives for" is a grammatically sound and frequently used expression to denote individuals or entities authorized to act on behalf of another party. As indicated by Ludwig, it's a valid phrase in written English. It is used in diverse contexts, particularly in news and media and formal business settings. While several alternatives exist, such as "agents of" or "delegates for", the choice depends on the specific nuance desired. It's crucial to use the plural form correctly and specify who is being represented to avoid ambiguity. The phrase is considered very common, with neutral to professional register.

FAQs

How can I use "representatives for" in a sentence?

You can use "representatives for" to indicate individuals or entities acting on behalf of a larger group or organization. For example, "The "representatives for" the company declined to comment on the matter."

What are some alternatives to "representatives for"?

Alternatives include "agents of", "delegates for", or "spokespersons for", depending on the specific context and nuance you wish to convey.

Is it correct to say "representative for" instead of "representatives for"?

While "representative for" can be correct when referring to a single individual, "representatives for" is used when referring to multiple individuals acting on behalf of an organization or entity. Be mindful of the number you're referring to.

What's the difference between "representatives for" and "officials of"?

"Representatives for" typically indicates individuals authorized to act or speak on behalf of an organization, while "officials of" refers to individuals holding a specific position within that organization. The former emphasizes representation, while the latter emphasizes official capacity.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

85%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: