Ai Feedback
Exact(10)
Within each replicate animals were randomly allocated to one of three groups: untreated control; IVM-CRC on Day 0; IVM-CRC on Day 84.
In experimental neuroscience studies, autoradiographic images taken under differing physiological or pathological conditions from replicate animals are often compared in order to detect any significant change in glucose utilization or blood flow and to localize these changes.
These include the size of the treatment response, the inherent variability associated with the endpoint of interest among normal, untreated males, and the number of replicate animals per treatment group.
Replicate animals (5.9 ± 1.72 g and 33.9 ± 2.13 mm) were stocked randomly on individual plates, and four paste diets containing PE ratios ranging from 87.2 to 102.9 mg/kcal were offered once daily (1600 h).
Within each replicate, animals were randomly assigned to treatment.
Replicate animals transplanted at the same time from the same donor (previous generation) were also tested.
Similar(50)
The replicate animal and metabolomic studies were separated in time.
As a result, five biological replicates (animals) from each group were included in the LCM procedures and RNA-seq analysis.
For this analysis we included in total 42 genotypes from 21 populations (the genotypes of one population were excluded, as in one replicate all animals went extinct).
For each biological replicate, ~8000 animals were harvested, washed and stored at -80°C until extraction.
Both BoHV-1/-5 recombinands and the BoHV-1 parental strain are attenuated in calves, although they are able to replicate in animals at low rates and to establish latent infections.
Related(19)
capture animals
imitate animals
breed animals
copy animals
play animals
duplicate animals
incorporate animals
reproduction animals
tests animals
translate animals
reproducing animals
promote animals
mimic animals
parallel animals
scans animals
replicate recipes
replicate determinations
replicate samples
clone animals
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com