repeat of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "repeat of" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase to indicate that something, such as an event or action, is happening again. For example, "The play was a repeat of the prior year's production."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Repeat, of all time.

Independent

A repeat of 2008, basically.

The Guardian - Opinion

A repeat of 1987, anyone?

The Guardian - Sport

Nobody wants a repeat of that.

The Economist

They feared a repeat of Intisar.

The New Yorker

"They don't want a repeat of Iraq".

The New York Times

"It's a repeat of the same script".

The New York Times

Dinner was a repeat of lunch.

The New York Times - Travel

We don't want a repeat of '91".

The New York Times

Don't bank on a repeat of that.

The Guardian - Sport

A repeat, of course, but welcome nonetheless.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "repeat of" to clearly indicate that an event, action, or situation is happening again or is similar to a previous occurrence. This helps maintain clarity and avoids ambiguity in your writing.

Common error

Avoid using "repeat of" when you intend to describe something that is merely similar but not a direct recurrence. Instead, opt for terms like "reminiscent of" or "similar to" to convey a less direct connection.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "repeat of" functions as a prepositional phrase, often used adjectivally to describe a noun. It indicates that something is happening again or is very similar to something that has happened before. Ludwig supports this usage with numerous examples.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

68%

Academia

11%

Science

8%

Less common in

Formal & Business

6%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "repeat of" is a common and grammatically sound prepositional phrase used to describe the recurrence or close similarity of an event or situation. According to Ludwig, it is used frequently in news and media. While versatile, ensure you're using it to describe genuine recurrences rather than just general similarities, and consider alternatives such as "recurrence of" or "repetition of" for nuanced meanings. Using "repeat of" effectively will ensure clarity and precision in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

repetition of

Focuses on the act of doing or saying something again.

recurrence of

Emphasizes the reappearance of something after a period of time.

duplication of

Highlights the act of creating an exact copy.

replication of

Implies a precise reproduction, often in a scientific or technical context.

echo of

Suggests a similarity or reminder of a past event or situation.

re-enactment of

Highlights the act of performing or staging something again.

restaging of

Focuses on recreating a scene or event.

mirroring of

Emphasizes the act of reflecting or imitating something closely.

recapitulation of

Suggests a summary or restatement of key points.

return of

Focuses on the reappearance or coming back of something.

FAQs

How can I use "repeat of" in a sentence?

You can use "repeat of" to indicate that something is happening again, similar to a previous event. For example, "The final game was a "repeat of" last year's championship".

What are some alternatives to "repeat of"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "recurrence of", "duplication of", or "repetition of".

Is it always appropriate to use "repeat of"?

While generally acceptable, "repeat of" is most suitable when describing direct recurrences or close similarities. For less direct comparisons, consider alternatives like "reminiscent of" or "akin to".

What's the difference between "repeat of" and "repetition of"?

"Repeat of" often refers to a specific event or situation mirroring a previous one, while "repetition of" generally describes the act of doing something again. The former has a more narrative implication.