reorganized for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reorganized for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing the act of changing the structure or arrangement of something for a specific purpose or audience. Example: "The report was reorganized for clarity, making it easier for the team to understand the key findings."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Encyclopedias

Science

Wiki

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

25 human-written examples

Reorganization can be effective, but government reorganized for the sake of reorganization will not necessarily be better.

Los Angeles Times

Those still in existence have been reorganized for efficiency.

Britannica

The section is reorganized for clarity and continuity.

Cornell University

The real trouble, according to the article by Brendan Greeley, is that closets don't stay reorganized for long.

The New York Times

from Table 1, which models an extra "change of address" that is applied in cases where codified legislation has been reorganized for passage into positive law.

Cornell University

The schools were reorganized for better interaction between teachers and students on a ratio of 14 to 19 pupils per teacher and renovated to produce nine elementary schools with full-day kindergarten and three middle schools.

The New York Times

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

35 human-written examples

Asked whether the reorganization would result in any layoffs, Mr. Semel said: "We are reorganizing for growth.

The New York Times - Tech

Rebel commanders have boasted that their forces have only withdrawn temporarily and are reorganizing for a counterattack.

The New York Times

The architecture of the brain is not fixed, and without images to process, the visual cortex can reorganize for new functions.

The New York Times - Magazine

After Pearl Harbor, when Roosevelt was free to reorganize for outright war, Mr. Knudsen, with his volunteer philosophy, was out, his office replaced by a War Production Board with greater authority.

The New York Times

In a contribution to the 2020 project, Garinois-Melenikiotou, CMO of Estée Lauder, suggests that by 2020, "global brands and agencies will reorganize themselves — with speed, agility, and editorial spirit — to create stories that will travel across countries without being lost in translation". Today more than ever, brands can and must reorganize for the global stage.

Harvard Business Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "reorganized for", clearly state the purpose of the reorganization to avoid ambiguity. For example, "The department was reorganized for better efficiency" is more effective than simply stating "The department was reorganized."

Common error

A common mistake is to state that something was "reorganized" without specifying the reason. This leaves the reader wondering why the change was made and can weaken your writing. Always clarify the goal of the reorganization.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reorganized for" functions as a purpose clause connector, indicating the reason or goal behind the act of reorganization. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically sound and widely used. Examples show its use in diverse contexts like efficiency improvements, clarity, or growth.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

37%

Academia

16%

Encyclopedias

12%

Less common in

Science

16%

Wiki

12%

Formal & Business

7%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "reorganized for" is a grammatically correct and commonly used phrase that functions as a purpose clause connector. It indicates the reason behind a structural change, with the aim of providing context and justification, according to Ludwig AI's analysis. While appearing in different contexts, it maintains a generally neutral tone. To ensure clarity and effectiveness, writers should always explicitly state the purpose of the reorganization. Related phrases, like "restructured to facilitate", can be used to introduce a nuanced meaning in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

restructured to facilitate

Focuses on structural changes to make something easier.

rearranged to enable

Highlights the rearrangement aspect to allow something to happen.

reconfigured with the aim of

Emphasizes a specific target or intention behind the reconfiguration.

reordered in order to

Specifically targets the order of elements and the reason for doing so.

re-engineered for

Suggests a more thorough redesign, often in a technical context.

overhauled to achieve

Implies a complete renovation with a specific outcome in mind.

recast to promote

Indicates a change in form or style to further a particular cause.

remodeled to support

Suggests changing the layout or design to provide assistance.

revamped targeting

Indicates an update or modernization specifically aimed at a particular goal.

adapted to better suit

Focuses on making changes to fit a new need or requirement.

FAQs

How can I use "reorganized for" in a sentence?

Use "reorganized for" to indicate that something has been restructured to achieve a specific purpose. For example, "The team was "reorganized for" better collaboration" shows that the reorganization aimed to improve teamwork.

What can I say instead of "reorganized for"?

You can use alternatives like "restructured to facilitate", "rearranged to enable", or "reconfigured with the aim of" depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Which is correct, "reorganized for efficiency" or "reorganized to be efficient"?

"Reorganized for efficiency" is generally preferred as it is more concise and direct. "Reorganized to be efficient" is grammatically correct but can sound less streamlined. Both express the same intention but "reorganized for efficiency" is the idiomatically accepted standard.

What's the difference between "reorganized for" and "restructured for"?

While both imply a change in structure, "restructured for" often suggests a more fundamental or significant alteration than ""reorganized for"". "Reorganized" can refer to simpler adjustments, whereas "restructured" implies a deeper systemic change.