removed to be

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "removed to be" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is unclear when or how this phrase could be used due to its lack of grammatical structure and context. Example: "The document was removed to be reviewed later." (Note: This is a correction of the original phrase.)

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

News & Media

Science

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

49 human-written examples

Technicians found the bolts they removed to be holding the antenna securely.

The New York Times - Science

He asks if I will allow "the tissue removed" to be used for medical science.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

Did he really get ribs removed to be able to give himself a blowjob?

The Guardian - Music

"There were some issues with the seats at the time, so I had them removed to be fixed," he said.

The New York Times

Those that refuse to do what Europe's paymasters tell them are unceremoniously removed to be replaced by more reliable figures.

The Guardian - Business

All the material on the site apart from scrap steel, which is removed to be recycled elsewhere, is being reused.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

11 human-written examples

And we like the pixels that we remove to be arranged into a single connected row.

Vice

The refusal of Israeli forces to let wounded Palestinians be removed to hospitals is inexplicable.

The New York Times

The future for the families who are removed to Nauru is unclear.

The Guardian

They were removed to 25°C and were shaken overnight.

BMC Biotechnology

Some ammunition had to be removed to accommodate him.

Wikipedia

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "removed to be" in formal writing; instead, opt for clearer and more concise alternatives like "removed for" or "taken for".

Common error

Using "removed to be" can create an unnecessarily wordy sentence. Simplify your writing by directly stating the purpose of removal: "The seats were removed for repair", not "The seats were removed to be fixed."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "removed to be" functions as a purpose connector, indicating the reason or intention behind the act of removing something. Ludwig AI identifies that the phrase is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

32%

Science

32%

Wiki

14%

Less common in

Formal & Business

8%

Reference

8%

Academia

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "removed to be" appears frequently across diverse sources, Ludwig AI identifies it as grammatically incorrect and awkward. It functions as a purpose connector, explaining the reason for removal, but more concise alternatives like "removed for" are generally preferred. Although the phrase is common, especially in news, science, and wiki contexts, adopting more direct language enhances clarity in both formal and informal writing. Instead of "removed to be", consider options such as "taken for" or "set aside for" to improve the precision and readability of your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

taken away for

Focuses on the physical act of taking something away for a specific purpose.

set aside for

Emphasizes the act of reserving or designating something for a particular use.

taken for

A shorter alternative emphasizing the action of taking something for an intended reason.

cleared for

Suggests the removal is done to prepare something for a specific function.

displaced for

Highlights that removal makes space for a substitute or replacement.

extracted for

Emphasizes the process of taking something out carefully for a particular use.

withdrawn for

Focuses on taking something back or away for a particular purpose.

detached for

Suggests that something has been separated for an intended result or function.

separated for

Emphasizes segregation of an item to ready it for a particular use.

diverted for

Highlights that something is rerouted or redirected to serve a particular objective.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "removed to be" for better clarity?

Consider using alternatives like "removed for", "taken for", or "set aside for" to improve clarity and conciseness.

Is "removed to be" grammatically correct?

While frequently encountered, "removed to be" is generally considered awkward and grammatically weak. Better options exist to convey the intended meaning.

What is a more direct way to express the purpose of removal than using "removed to be"?

Instead of saying "The parts were removed to be cleaned", try "The parts were removed for cleaning". This version is shorter and more to the point.

When might "removed to be" be acceptable, and when should it be avoided?

Although sometimes used, "removed to be" should generally be avoided in favor of more concise constructions. It is rarely the best choice in formal or informal writing.