removed for

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "removed for" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when indicating that something has been taken out or omitted for a specific reason, often in contexts like editing or content moderation. Example: "The sensitive information was removed for privacy reasons."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

His handcuffs were removed for the proceeding.

The New York Times

Meanwhile, all certainties are removed for Cabañas.

The New York Times - Sports

The governor was removed for acting corruptly.

The New York Times

Clients are not removed for propositioning dancers.

The Guardian - Lifestyle

"Saturn", it said, "temporarily removed for repairs".

The New Yorker

Employers' national insurance removed for young people.

The Guardian

Other teachers are removed for outright misconduct.

The New York Times

Comments have been removed for legal reasons.

The Guardian

CDR2s have been removed for clarity.

Nature

They will then be removed for disposal in an autoclave.

The Guardian

Others have them removed for cosmetic reasons.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "removed for", ensure the reason is clearly stated and directly relevant to the action of removal. This improves clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "removed for" without specifying the reason. For example, instead of saying "The item was removed for security", specify "The item was removed for security concerns due to potential malware".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "removed for" functions as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb, indicating the reason or purpose behind the action of removal. As Ludwig AI confirms, this phrase is grammatically sound and commonly used across diverse contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

28%

News & Media

27%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

6%

Academia

3%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "removed for" is a common and grammatically sound way to indicate that something has been taken away or omitted because of a specific reason. As Ludwig AI highlights, its versatility allows it to be used across various contexts, from scientific papers to news articles and formal business documents. The phrase's high frequency and neutral register confirm its widespread acceptance and applicability. When using "removed for", ensure the reason is clearly stated to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "eliminated due to" or "omitted because of" can provide stylistic variation. By following these guidelines, you can effectively and clearly communicate the reasons behind removals in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

taken away because of

This alternative replaces "removed" with "taken away" and specifies the reason using "because of".

eliminated due to

This alternative uses "eliminated" to convey removal and "due to" to indicate the cause.

excluded on account of

This alternative uses "excluded" and "on account of" to express the reason for removal.

withdrawn as a result of

This phrase substitutes "removed" with "withdrawn" and uses "as a result of" to indicate the consequence.

omitted because of

This alternative replaces "removed" with "omitted", focusing on the absence of something and using "because of" to explain why.

extracted due to

This option focuses on extraction as the form of removal with the causal marker "due to".

deleted as a consequence of

This alternative uses "deleted" and "as a consequence of" for a stronger emphasis on removal and its result.

dismissed owing to

This option means something was disregarded because of a reason

disregarded given

This alternative means something was ignored or left out given the reason.

excised as a function of

A more formal alternative, primarily useful in medical or scientific contexts.

FAQs

How do I use "removed for" in a sentence?

Use "removed for" to indicate that something was taken away or omitted because of a specific reason. For example, "The comment was "removed for" violating community guidelines."

What are some alternatives to "removed for"?

Alternatives include "eliminated due to", "excluded on account of", or "omitted because of", depending on the context.

Is it correct to say "removed for" or should I use another phrasing?

The phrase "removed for" is grammatically correct and widely used. However, you can choose a different phrasing like "taken away because of" to add variety to your writing.

What's the difference between "removed for" and "deleted for"?

"Removed for" generally means taken away, while "deleted for" specifically implies that something was erased or permanently eliminated from a digital context. Choose the phrase that best fits the specific action.