remarkably poorly

USAGE SUMMARY

"remarkably poorly" is correct and usable in written English. You can use it to emphasize the extent of poor performance or quality. Example: "The project was executed remarkably poorly, leading to significant delays." Alternative expressions include "exceptionally badly" and "surprisingly poorly."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

10 human-written examples

Yet as familiar as the coyote seems, these animals remain remarkably poorly understood.

The New York Times - Science

Winners of the Most Beautiful Girl in Nigeria went year after year to the Miss World competition, and year after year the beauty queens performed remarkably poorly.

The New York Times

Amid the acrimony surrounding the firing of Jill Abramson, executive editor of the New York Times, there's one point of near-universal consensus: the whole thing was remarkably poorly handled.

The Guardian

Tennis is a game of matchups and Ferreira, for all his success over the seasons against Pete Sampras, matches up remarkably poorly with Agassi, in large part because Agassi knows that Ferreira's backhand is his weak wing and has the precision and pace to find it repeatedly.

The New York Times - Sports

"Kokomo was remarkably poorly positioned.

Forbes

Japanese sites tend to fall in the mistake category: They do remarkably poorly in our Index, none making it into the top half of the ranking.

Forbes

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

50 human-written examples

Remarkably, intermediate and poorly differentiated tumors (grade 2 and 3) showed overexpression of NQO1 protein more often than those showing low differentiation (grade 1).

BMC Cancer

With several production numbers per episode, almost all of which have remarkably weak choreography and poorly synched lip-synching, the writers haven't been able to go very deep into anyone's life.

The New Yorker

Remarkably, sIBM patients are poorly responsive to anti-inflammatory or immunosuppressive treatments, suggesting that inflammation per se may not be a primary cause of the disease [16].

Plosone

Most remarkably, though NCenH3 is poorly conserved through evolution [16], [17], the presence of R-rich motives is a common feature of NCenH3 from distant species, including budding yeast and humans [2].

Plosone

Remarkably, these processes remain still poorly understood despite their significance in the operation of lithium battery systems in critical technologies.

Nano Energy

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "remarkably poorly" to add emphasis when describing something that performs below expectations in a noticeable way. It's stronger than just saying 'poorly'.

Common error

While grammatically correct, "remarkably poorly" can sound somewhat informal. In formal writing, consider alternatives like "significantly deficient" or "notably inadequate" for a more professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "remarkably poorly" functions as an adverbial phrase that modifies a verb, adjective, or another adverb. It emphasizes the degree to which an action is performed or a condition exists in a deficient or inadequate manner. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is grammatically correct and usable in written English.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

64%

Science

32%

Wiki

4%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "remarkably poorly" is a grammatically sound and usable adverbial phrase that adds emphasis to the degree to which something is done poorly. It's most commonly found in News & Media and Science contexts. While correct, consider more formal alternatives like "significantly deficient" in professional writing. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and provides examples of its usage across various reliable sources.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

exceptionally badly

Replaces "remarkably" with "exceptionally", intensifying the degree of poorness.

surprisingly poorly

Substitutes "remarkably" with "surprisingly", highlighting the unexpected nature of the poor performance.

notably inadequate

Uses "notably" to emphasize the inadequacy, shifting from an adverbial to an adjectival phrase.

distinctly deficient

Employs "distinctly" to underscore the deficiency, offering a slightly more formal tone.

strikingly inadequate

Replaces "remarkably" with "strikingly", indicating a noticeable inadequacy.

conspicuously deficient

Uses "conspicuously" to denote that the deficiency is easily noticeable.

noticeably weak

Shifts from "poorly" to "weak", implying a lack of strength or quality that is easily observed.

patently insufficient

Replaces the adverbial phrase with an adjectival one, emphasizing the obvious insufficiency.

woefully inadequate

Replaces "remarkably" with "woefully", implying a sense of sorrow or regret about the inadequacy.

terribly substandard

Substitutes the original phrase with an adjective emphasizing the low quality or standard.

FAQs

How can I use "remarkably poorly" in a sentence?

You can use "remarkably poorly" to describe something done with a surprising lack of skill or quality. For example, "The project was executed "remarkably poorly", leading to significant delays".

What can I say instead of "remarkably poorly"?

You can use alternatives like "exceptionally badly", "surprisingly poorly", or "notably inadequate" depending on the context.

Which is correct, "remarkably poorly" or "remarkably bad"?

Both "remarkably poorly" and "remarkably bad" are grammatically correct, but they have slightly different meanings. "Remarkably poorly" emphasizes the manner in which something was done, while "remarkably bad" describes the quality of something.

What's the difference between "remarkably poorly" and "plainly poorly"?

"Remarkably poorly" indicates something is done poorly to a degree that is noticeable or surprising. "Plainly poorly" suggests something is simply done poorly, without necessarily implying surprise.