remained in force

USAGE SUMMARY

"remained in force" is a correct phrase in written English and can be used to refer to something that continues to stay in effect.
Example: The law, first passed in 1933, remained in force until 1992.

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Encyclopedias

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

On Sunday, government officials insisted again that the deal remained in force despite obvious Taliban violations.

The New York Times

They remained in force for five days.

The Economist

The order remained in force.

The New Yorker

It remained in force until 2002, when Vittorio Emanuele returned.

The New York Times

Acquired rights and concordats in force remained in force.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The old contract has remained in force, though.

The New York Times

The edict remained in force until the revocation in 1685.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Israel's naval blockade of Gaza has remained in force.

The New York Times

Traditions of modern art remained in force, but only as elements of a pragmatic new order.

The New Yorker

This afternoon, 17 flood watches and four warnings remained in force.

The Guardian

It was not clear why the restrictions remained in force today.

The Guardian

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "remained in force" to emphasize the continuation and lack of change in a particular situation or policy, often in legal or formal contexts.

Common error

Avoid using "remained in force" to describe physical objects or abstract concepts that don't typically have a defined operational status; it's best suited for policies, regulations, or agreements.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "remained in force" functions as a predicate in sentences, indicating the state or condition of a law, rule, or agreement. Ludwig AI shows many examples where it specifies that a previously established regulation continued to be valid and operational. The verb "remained" connects the subject to the condition of being "in force."

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

35%

Encyclopedias

30%

Wiki

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Science

10%

Reference

5%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "remained in force" is a grammatically correct and commonly used expression to indicate that a law, rule, or agreement continued to be effective. Ludwig AI confirms its frequent appearance in neutral and formal contexts, particularly in news, encyclopedias, and legal documents. It is essential to use this phrase when discussing regulations or policies and to avoid applying it to physical objects or abstract concepts. Alternatives like "stayed effective" or "continued in effect" can be used for variety, but "remained in force" provides a specific emphasis on the sustained validity of a rule or agreement.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

continued to apply

Emphasizes the ongoing application or relevance of something.

continued in effect

Highlights the continuity of something's impact or operation.

was still valid

Indicates that something maintained its validity or legal standing.

was still applicable

Highlights continued relevance or suitability.

stayed effective

Focuses on the effectiveness of something over time.

was sustained

Focuses on something being maintained or supported over time.

held its validity

Focuses on the aspect of something maintaining its legal or formal correctness.

persisted in operation

Emphasizes the ongoing functioning or application of something.

was not repealed

Focuses on the aspect that a law or rule was not cancelled.

endured without change

Indicates that something persisted in its original form.

FAQs

How can I use "remained in force" in a sentence?

Use "remained in force" to indicate that a law, rule, or agreement continued to be effective over a period. For example, "Despite the challenges, the treaty "remained in force" for several decades."

What's an alternative to "remained in force"?

Alternatives include "stayed effective", "continued in effect", or "was still valid", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "stayed in force" instead of "remained in force"?

Yes, "stayed in force" is a valid alternative to "remained in force", although "remained in force" might be perceived as slightly more formal.

What is the difference between "remained in force" and "came into force"?

"Remained in force" indicates that something was already in effect and continued to be so, while "came into force" refers to the moment something initially became effective. For example: "The new law "came into force" on January 1st, and "remained in force" for five years."