remain without

USAGE SUMMARY

"remain without" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when you want to say that someone or something has not or will not have something. For example: "He will remain without a job until the economy improves."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Around 38,000 people remain without power.

The Economist

84,920 remain without electricity.

The Guardian

At least 350,000 people remain without homes.

The New York Times

France remain without a world title from three finals.

The Guardian - Sport

Some 26.3 million adults remain without insurance of their own.

The Guardian

At present, forty-six U.S. Embassies remain without an Ambassador.

The New Yorker

Fourteen of the Tories' target seats remain without a candidate.

The Guardian

Downtown, hundreds of thousands of people remain without power.

The New Yorker

Many houses remain without electricity, and therefore without burglar alarms.

The New York Times

He has accused Mr. Toussaint of failing union members, who remain without a contract.

The New York Times

But the Mets remain without a World Series title since 1986.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Pair the phrase with abstract nouns like "protection", "diagnosis", or "contract" to describe systemic or administrative states of lack.

Common error

Avoid using "still" immediately before the phrase (e.g., "they still remain without"). Since "remain" already implies a continuation of a state, "still" is often redundant and adds unnecessary wordiness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "remain without" functions as a linking verb phrase followed by a prepositional complement. It identifies a subject and describes its persistent state of lacking a specific object or quality. In the examples provided by Ludwig, it frequently links populations (e.g., "38,000 people") or entities ("46 U.S. Embassies") to a missing resource or leader.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

65%

Science

25%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Social Media

5%

Wiki

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "remain without" is a highly effective and grammatically sound expression used to describe the continuation of a lacking state. As evidenced by the extensive data from Ludwig, it is a staple of high-level journalism and scientific writing. It is most frequently employed to discuss humanitarian issues (lack of utilities), sports (lack of wins), and medical research (lack of diagnosis). Ludwig AI confirms its correctness, making it a reliable choice for professional communication where an objective description of an ongoing deficiency is required. For writers looking to vary their prose, alternatives like "continue to lack" or "stay without" can be used without losing semantic precision.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

continue to lack

Uses a more formal verbal structure to emphasize the ongoing nature of the deficiency.

stay without

A slightly more informal synonym that maintains the same structural meaning.

persist without

Highlights that the state of lacking something is continuing despite efforts or time.

go without

Focuses on the experience of not having something, often implying a degree of hardship.

exist without

Broader in scope, often used in scientific or philosophical contexts to describe a fundamental state.

lack indefinitely

Adds a temporal dimension, suggesting there is no clear end to the state of missing something.

keep lacking

A more colloquial and repetitive way to describe the ongoing absence.

stay deprived of

A stronger term that suggests the subject is being denied something necessary.

be devoid of

A more literary or absolute way to say something is completely empty of a quality.

endure without

Specifically emphasizes the difficulty or the act of surviving despite the lack.

FAQs

How to use "remain without" in a sentence?

You can use "remain without" to show that a state of lacking something is continuing. For example: "Thousands of homes "remain without" power after the storm."

Is it correct to say "remain without"?

Yes, as confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is a perfectly correct and widely used phrase in written English, especially in news and scientific contexts.

What can I say instead of "remain without"?

Depending on your context, you could use "continue to lack", "stay without", or "go without".

What is the difference between "remain without" and "go without"?

While both imply lacking something, "go without" often suggests an active experience of hardship or a choice, whereas "remain without" focuses more objectively on the state itself continuing.