relevance for

USAGE SUMMARY

"relevance for" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing the relevance of something in regard to a particular context. For example: The findings of this study have relevance for public health policy.

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Academia

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

This has particular relevance for soccer.

The New Yorker

This has specific relevance for artists.

The New York Times

Part 1: relevance for autism.

Nature

Any culture finds a relevance for it.

The Guardian

I'd happily trade you relevance for information.

The Guardian - Tech

Physiological implications and relevance for Alzheimer's disease.

Nature

Explain its relevance for mobile applications.

Stanford University

Monitor has relevance for today's realities.

Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Its relevance for understanding China, therefore, is strictly limited.

The Guardian - Books

Globalization has a special relevance for the island's artists.

The New York Times - Arts

Its relevance for decisions on institutional funding is not questioned.

Nature

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "relevance for", clearly define the subject or area to which something is relevant. This helps ensure clarity and avoids ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "relevance for" when the connection is tenuous or weak. Ensure there is a demonstrable and significant link; otherwise, the statement may seem exaggerated or misleading.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "relevance for" indicates a relationship of importance or applicability between one thing and another. According to Ludwig, it is correct and frequently used, highlighting its role in connecting concepts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

40%

Academia

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "relevance for" is a prepositional phrase used to indicate the importance or applicability of something in a particular context. Ludwig AI confirms it's grammatically correct and widely accepted. It is commonly used in science, news, academia, and formal business settings, as demonstrated by Ludwig's examples. For clear and effective writing, define the scope and avoid overstating the link. Alternatives include "significance to" and "importance to", depending on the desired nuance. By following these guidelines, you can effectively use "relevance for" to enhance your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

significance to

Focuses more on the importance or consequence something has to something else.

importance to

Highlights the value or weight that something holds for a particular subject or area.

pertinence to

Emphasizes the direct relationship and applicability to a specific matter.

bearing on

Implies an influence or impact on a specific subject, often suggesting a connection.

application to

Highlights the practical use or relevance in a specific scenario or field.

relation to

Indicates a connection or association, without necessarily implying importance.

connectedness to

Suggests a link or bond, often used to highlight how one thing is intertwined with another.

implications for

Focuses on the potential effects or consequences that something may have.

usefulness for

Highlights the practical benefit or value in achieving a specific goal.

appropriateness for

Emphasizes the suitability or fitting nature in a particular situation.

FAQs

How can I use "relevance for" in a sentence?

Use "relevance for" to show how something applies or matters in a particular context. For example, "The study has significant "relevance for" urban planning policy."

What are some alternatives to "relevance for"?

You can use alternatives such as "significance to", "importance to", or "pertinence to" depending on the specific context and nuance you want to convey.

Is there a difference between "relevance for" and "relevance to"?

While similar, "relevance for" often highlights a direct use or application, while "relevance to" suggests a broader relationship or connection. Choose the preposition that best reflects the intended relationship.

How do I determine the "relevance for" a specific topic?

To determine the "relevance for" a specific topic, consider how directly it affects or informs the subject. Assess whether the information provides insights, solutions, or advancements related to the topic.