related in type

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "related in type" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe items, concepts, or categories that share a common characteristic or classification. Example: "The two species are related in type, both belonging to the same family of plants."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

Both are somewhat related in type to the Tomb of Diocletian (c. 300) at Split in Croatia.

Britannica

In another study we found that BMI and total testosterone and free testosterone concentrations were also inversely related in type 1 diabetic men who rarely had hypogonadism (5).

Diabetes Care

Plasma levels of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule (sVCAM-1) and soluble E-selectin (sE-selectin) were also strongly and independently associated with inflammatory markers, suggesting that endothelial dysfunction and inflammatory activity (reflected by predominantly nonendothelium-derived markers) are related in type 1 diabetes (5).

Diabetes Care

These authors also reported that plasma levels of soluble vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (sVCAM-1) and soluble E-selectin (sE-selectin), markers of endothelial dysfunction, were strongly and independently associated with inflammatory markers, suggesting that endothelial dysfunction and inflammatory activity are closely related in type 1 diabetes mellitus.

Diabetes Care

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

Diabetic nephropathy and cardiovascular disease are strongly related in adults with type 1 diabetes, yet little is known about this relationship in adolescents prior to the onset of detectable clinical disease.

Diabetes Care

It displays disease-related cell types, anatomical compartments and organs, as well as related in vitro cell types from human and mouse.

Database : the journal of biological databases and curation

Alterations in E-cadherin expression have been related in several cancer types and correlated with pathological features such as poor tumoral differentiation, infiltrative growth, lymph node metastasis and decreased patient survival [ 11- 13].

BMC Cancer

Objectives: The aim of this study is to investigate the status of oxidative stress and nitric oxide related parameters in type II diabetes mellitus (DM) patients in which heart disease, atherosclerosis, retinopathy, and nephropathy commonly occur, and also to determine the effect of glycemic control on these parameters.

Clinical Biochemistry

Plasma levels of sVCAM-1 and sE-selectin were also strongly and independently associated with these inflammatory markers, suggesting that endothelial dysfunction and inflammatory activity are related events in type 1 diabetes (5).

Diabetes Care

This is not related in a "poor little me" type manner.

Huffington Post

The present study examined how these two memory types were related in terms of their associated resting-state functional architecture.

NeuroImage

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "related in type" when emphasizing a formal or technical connection between items based on a specific classification or category.

Common error

Avoid using "related in type" in informal writing or everyday conversation. Opt for simpler alternatives like "similar" or "alike" when the specific classification isn't crucial.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "related in type" functions as an adjective phrase followed by a prepositional phrase, modifying a noun by indicating a specific kind of relationship or similarity based on classification. As confirmed by Ludwig, it's suitable for describing items sharing characteristics.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

75%

Encyclopedias

25%

News & Media

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "related in type" is a grammatically sound construction used to denote a formal connection between items based on shared characteristics or classification. As indicated by Ludwig, it is most appropriate in formal, scientific, and technical contexts. While grammatically correct and usable, it is relatively rare compared to simpler alternatives like "similar" or "alike". The phrase is primarily found in science and encyclopedia contexts. Using this phrase correctly involves understanding its technical and formal nature, avoiding overuse in casual settings and choosing it when specific classification is important.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

similar in nature

Focuses on the shared essence or fundamental qualities.

of the same kind

Highlights belonging to the same category or class.

analogous in form

Emphasizes a similarity in structure or appearance.

comparable in style

Indicates a resemblance in manner or method.

akin in character

Suggests a similarity in inherent traits or qualities.

resembling in category

Highlights a similarity in the group or class to which something belongs.

correspondent in variety

Implies a similarity across different types or variations.

linked by classification

Focuses on the shared taxonomic or organizational structure.

allied in species

Suggests a close relationship within a particular biological classification.

associated by genus

Points to a connection through a shared generic characteristic or origin.

FAQs

How can I use "related in type" in a sentence?

The phrase "related in type" is used to describe items that share a common characteristic or classification. For example, "Both structures are "related in type" to Roman architecture".

What are some alternatives to "related in type"?

You can use alternatives such as "similar in nature", "of the same kind", or "analogous in form" depending on the specific context.

In what context is "related in type" most appropriate?

The phrase "related in type" is most suitable in formal or technical writing where a specific classification or categorization is being emphasized. It's often seen in scientific or academic contexts.

What's the difference between "related in type" and "similar to"?

"Related in type" implies a formal connection based on a shared classification, while "similar to" suggests a general resemblance without necessarily belonging to the same category.