rejected points

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "rejected points" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used in contexts where certain points, ideas, or arguments have been dismissed or not accepted. Example: "During the meeting, we discussed several proposals, but ultimately, the rejected points were not included in the final plan."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Should a proposal be selected for implementation, shareholders are rewarded with yet more DWPeas, but if it is rejected, points are lost.

The Guardian

Note that real points can occur both on the equator and the prime meridian so that some rejected points could be genuine (Figure 4).

Plosone

We rejected points created with < 50 values, enabling 95% global geographic coverage.

Environmental Health Perspectives

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Several of the exorbitant CIA claims, in some cases reiterated long after they were known to be false, are rejected point by point in the report.

The Guardian - Opinion

Here m is the number of DR stages applied for every rejected point, and m is often chosen to be 2 in practice (Haario et al. 2006).

Petroleum Science

If the null hypothesis was rejected, point estimates and 95% CI were estimated on the basis of random effects model was presented, otherwise the fixed effects model was presented.

BMC Medical Research Methodology

Observant Muslims contest, dispute, accept and reject points of doctrine exactly as those from other faiths do.

The Guardian

They will perceive supervision based on previous experience and integrate supervision approaches into their existing values, adopting elements that are consistent with their perspectives and possibly rejecting points that are not (89).

Global Health Action

In a series of straight-talking videos set in front of a bustling campaign office, she rejects point by point Mr. Romney's policies.

The New York Times

The Home Office, pointing out that the work is optional, has rejected the points raised but said it would review the rates of pay.

The Guardian

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit had allowed that law to go forward, but the Third Circuit judges directly rejected many points in the Ninth Circuit opinion.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "rejected points", ensure the context clearly indicates what criteria were used for the rejection. Be specific about why these points were not accepted.

Common error

Avoid using "rejected points" without explaining the reason for rejection. This can lead to confusion and ambiguity. Always provide context or justification for why the points were rejected.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "rejected points" functions as a noun phrase where "rejected" modifies "points". It typically identifies specific items, arguments, or data that have been dismissed or not accepted for a particular reason. Ludwig provides several examples of its use in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

33%

News & Media

33%

Wiki

0%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "rejected points" is a grammatically correct and usable expression for indicating points, ideas, or data that have been dismissed or not accepted. Ludwig AI confirms the phrase's validity. While not exceedingly common, it finds use in various contexts including science, news, and formal discussions. When using this phrase, it's best practice to provide clear criteria for rejection to avoid ambiguity. Alternatives like "discarded arguments" or "dismissed ideas" can be used depending on the specific context. Remember to clarify why the points were rejected for better clarity.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

discarded arguments

Focuses on the act of throwing away or getting rid of arguments, emphasizing their unsuitability.

dismissed ideas

Highlights the act of considering ideas as unworthy of attention or consideration.

unaccepted proposals

Emphasizes the lack of approval or agreement for suggested plans or ideas.

declined suggestions

Focuses on the refusal of offered advice or recommendations.

refused propositions

Highlights the act of rejecting formally presented statements or judgments.

overruled objections

Emphasizes the act of rejecting challenges or arguments, especially in a formal setting.

vetoed items

Indicates that specific items or points have been prohibited or rejected by someone in authority.

nullified claims

Focuses on the act of making claims invalid or without legal force.

invalidated arguments

Emphasizes that arguments are proven to be without factual or logical basis.

withdrawn statements

Highlights statements that have been taken back or retracted.

FAQs

How can I use "rejected points" in a sentence?

You can use "rejected points" to describe ideas or arguments that were not accepted. For example, "The committee reviewed several proposals, but the "rejected points" were deemed unfeasible due to budget constraints."

What are some alternatives to the phrase "rejected points"?

Alternatives include "discarded arguments", "dismissed ideas", or "unaccepted proposals" depending on the context.

Is it better to say "rejected points" or "points that were rejected"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "rejected points" is more concise. "Points that were rejected" may be preferable if you want to emphasize the action of rejection, or if you need to add more detail about how the points were rejected.

In what contexts is it appropriate to use "rejected points"?

"Rejected points" is appropriate in formal and informal settings, such as academic discussions, business meetings, or news reports, where there's a need to identify and discuss points that have been dismissed.