rehash of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "rehash of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to a repetition or restatement of ideas, often in a way that lacks originality. Example: "The article was just a rehash of previous studies without offering any new insights."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

"It's a rehash of Clinton's, which was a rehash of Carter's," Mr. Josten said.

The New York Times

It's a cynical rehash of earlier plans.

The Guardian

It can't be a rehash of a known negative.

The New York Times

Often the attacks are a rehash of the old clichés.

The New York Times

As the reviewers noted, the film's dialogue is a rehash of other Westerns.

The New Yorker

In one sense, this is a rehash of an age-old conflict between change and conservatism.

Independent

This pedestrian rehash of the story reads almost like one of the Victorian hagiographies.

The New Yorker

The House budget is also getting criticized for being a rehash of defeated ideas.

The New Yorker

This aspect of the story is a blatant rehash of "Vertigo".

The New York Times

The speech was largely a rehash of his standard campaign stump speech.

The New York Times

The packaging was good, but much of the content was a rehash of old promises.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "rehash of", ensure the context clearly indicates that something is being repeated or recycled without significant innovation or change. It's often used to express criticism or lack of originality.

Common error

Avoid using "rehash of" in highly formal or professional documents where a more neutral term like "review of" or "summary of" might be more appropriate to maintain a professional tone.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "rehash of" functions as a noun modifier, typically used to describe something that is a repetition or reworking of existing material. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in various contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

70%

Wiki

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Science

5%

Encyclopedias

3%

Social Media

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "rehash of" is a common expression used to describe something lacking in originality, often implying a negative assessment. Ludwig AI confirms its grammatical correctness and frequent usage, particularly within news and media contexts. While versatile, it is advisable to use more neutral terms such as "summary of" or "review of" in formal writing to avoid any unintended critical undertones. When using "rehash of", ensure the context highlights a clear lack of innovation. Ludwig's examples show how "rehash of" effectively conveys the idea of recycled content across various domains.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

repetition of

Focuses on the act of repeating something already said or done.

restatement of

Emphasizes a new or different way of expressing something already known.

recap of

Highlights a summary or brief review of previous information.

reworking of

Implies a more significant alteration or adaptation than a simple repeat.

revisiting of

Suggests returning to a topic or idea for further consideration.

reimagining of

Emphasizes creative reinterpretation or redesign.

duplication of

Focuses on making an exact copy, often in a negative context.

echo of

Suggests a faint or indirect resemblance to something else.

paraphrase of

Involves expressing the same meaning using different words.

carbon copy of

Highlights an exact, often uninspired, imitation.

FAQs

How can I use "rehash of" in a sentence?

You can use "rehash of" to describe something that is a repetition of old ideas or content. For example: "The new proposal was just a "rehash of" previous failed attempts."

What are some alternatives to "rehash of"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives such as "repetition of", "restatement of", or "reworking of".

Is it appropriate to use "rehash of" in formal writing?

While generally acceptable, using "rehash of" in formal writing might be perceived as overly critical. Consider more neutral alternatives like "review of" or "summary of" for a more professional tone.

What is the difference between "rehash of" and "summary of"?

"Rehash of" often implies a negative connotation, suggesting a lack of originality. "Summary of", on the other hand, is a neutral term that simply means a condensed version of something.