regulations in the name of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "regulations in the name of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when referring to rules or laws that are established or enforced under a specific authority or for a particular purpose. Example: "The new regulations in the name of public safety have been implemented to ensure the well-being of all citizens."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

He wants more leverage, not less, and says the Group of 20 nations should step in to cut through regulations in the name of economic growth.

The New York Times

Will we apply growth-stunting regulations in the name of "never again"?

Forbes

He wrote a concurring opinion in 2015 suggesting it's appropriate for courts to second-guess legislatures and strike down basic health and safety regulations in the name of economic liberty.

Huffington Post

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

Republicans usually oppose government regulation in the name of free choice.

The Economist

They've pushed for even more de-regulation in the name of "creating jobs".

Huffington Post

An increasing number of regulations adopted in the name of helping investors had hardly helped.

The New York Times

Objecting to most of those ideas before they have even been officially proposed, House Republicans have a different agenda in mind – one echoed by almost all of the Republican presidential candidates over Labor Day weekend – which revolves centrally around dismantling regulations, also in the name of job creation.

The New York Times

According to this approach, clubs have a central role in elaborating regulations, both in the name of a process to increase the value created and in consideration of the fact that, subsequently, they could gain a greater part of this value in virtue of a more intense competition.

Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship

Wall Street has spent months opposing the financial regulation bill in the name of families and small businesses.

The New York Times

It stands to reason then, that a "corporate capitalism" such as ours that seems increasingly interested in enriching senior executives, and thwarting risk-curbing regulation all in the name of protecting the free market, (especially in the financial sector), needs to be called to account by its owners: and that would be us.

Huffington Post

Agencies have been devised as an antidote to such problems either by becoming watchdogs that alert governments to the abuse of laws and regulations or by regulating governments themselves in the name of efficiency, consumer protection, and, less frequently, the citizen.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "regulations in the name of", ensure the stated purpose genuinely aligns with the actual effect of the regulations to avoid accusations of hypocrisy or hidden agendas.

Common error

Avoid using "regulations in the name of" when the regulations primarily benefit a specific group or organization rather than serving the stated purpose. Overuse can lead to cynicism and mistrust.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "regulations in the name of" serves as a prepositional phrase that modifies a verb or noun, indicating the stated purpose or justification for implementing specific regulations. It is used to frame the intent behind the rules, as supported by Ludwig AI, which confirms its grammatical correctness.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

50%

Science

30%

Encyclopedias

20%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "regulations in the name of" is a grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to denote the stated purpose behind implementing specific regulations. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is a common expression across various contexts, particularly in news and media, science, and encyclopedias. While versatile, it's important to ensure the stated purpose aligns with the actual effects of the regulations to maintain transparency and credibility. Alternative phrases like "rules justified by" or "policies implemented to" can offer more neutral phrasing depending on the context. Common errors involve misattributing the true beneficiaries of the regulations, so it is important to apply caution.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

rules under the guise of

Changes the wording to emphasize potential deception or hidden motives behind the stated purpose.

laws enacted for the sake of

Replaces "regulations" with "laws" and "in the name of" with "for the sake of", focusing on the purpose behind the legislation.

rules justified by

Simplifies the phrase, highlighting the justification for the rules.

policies implemented to

Shifts the focus to the implementation and intended outcome of the policies.

directives issued under the authority of

Emphasizes the official and authoritative nature of the directives.

statutes established to

Uses a more formal term, "statutes", to refer to the regulations.

ordinances passed with the aim of

Focuses on local laws and the intended goal of their enactment.

restrictions imposed for the purpose of

Highlights the restrictive nature of the regulations and their underlying purpose.

mandates created to achieve

Emphasizes the obligatory nature of the mandates and their desired outcome.

standards set with the intention of

Focuses on the establishment of standards and their intended impact.

FAQs

How can I rephrase "regulations in the name of" to sound more neutral?

You can use phrases like "rules justified by", or "policies implemented to" which focus on the purpose without implying judgment.

What is the difference between "regulations in the name of" and "under the guise of"?

"Regulations in the name of" typically implies a stated, official purpose, while "under the guise of" suggests a hidden or deceptive motive.

Is it appropriate to use "regulations in the name of" in formal writing?

Yes, "regulations in the name of" is suitable for formal writing, especially when discussing legal, political, or economic contexts. However, ensure the tone remains objective and avoids bias.

Can I use "laws enacted for the sake of" instead of "regulations in the name of"?

Yes, "laws enacted for the sake of" is a valid alternative, particularly when referring to formal legal statutes and emphasizing their intended benefit.