regular quality

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "regular quality" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe something that meets a standard level of quality, neither exceptional nor poor. Example: "The product is of regular quality, suitable for everyday use but not for professional applications."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

These are bound to suffer in the event that large prisons are unlikely to be able to accommodate sufficient visitor capacity to enable prisoners to receive regular, quality visits.

The Guardian

In 2004, the IGDA – the only large organisation advocating for labour rights in the US games industry – started a regular "quality of life" survey in response to the EA controversy, polling staff on working standards and practices.

The Guardian - Tech

"Finally, the general committee should have included milk in its regular quality controls, as it did for bread, cheese and meat," the Verita research concludes, pointing the finger back at all those who ignored the evidence.

The Guardian

It's gamification of healthcare news was dull, and its regular quality is hardly well regarded.

TechCrunch

The systems were officially calibrated, and regular quality checks were carried out.

EJNMMI Research

This strategy would bring pollutants' concentrations down from observed regular quality levels to good quality levels.

Latin American Economic Review

Research shows that regular, quality and intensive early childhood education makes a positive impact on children's learning later in life.

International Journal of Child Care and Education Policy

Respondents state their willingness to monetarily contribute to improve air levels from observed regular quality to good quality.

Latin American Economic Review

In this context, it is fundamental to establish a regular quality control to ensure quantitative indices constancy.

Médecine Nucléaire

The problem is Tidal subscriptions costs $20 for high-definition streaming and $10 for regular quality, with no free ad-supported option.

TechCrunch

Monitor and graphics cards used by radiologists on their reporting workstations must have regular quality assessment and must be fit for the purpose of diagnostic display.

Insights into Imaging

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When describing products or services, use "regular quality" to indicate a standard level of performance or construction, avoiding overly positive or negative connotations. This sets realistic expectations for consumers.

Common error

Avoid using "regular quality" when you intend to convey superior or exceptional quality. Doing so can mislead readers and undermine the credibility of your claims. Choose adjectives like "premium" or "high" when describing superior quality.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "regular quality" functions as a descriptive adjective phrase modifying a noun. As Ludwig AI indicates, it describes something that meets a standard level of quality, neither exceptionally good nor poor. Examples from Ludwig show its use in describing products, services, and processes.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

52%

News & Media

22%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "regular quality" is a grammatically correct and frequently used term to describe something that meets a standard or typical level of quality. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's neither exceptionally good nor poor. This term appears across various sources, including science, news, and business, making it versatile for many contexts. While it's important to avoid overstating its meaning, recognizing its neutral connotation ensures precise communication. Alternatives such as "standard quality", "average quality", and "acceptable quality" can be used depending on the specific context.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

standard quality

Replaces "regular" with "standard", implying a commonly accepted level of quality.

consistent quality

Focuses on the uniformity and reliability of the quality.

average quality

Indicates a quality that is neither exceptionally good nor bad.

normal quality

Suggests a quality that is typical or expected.

typical quality

Similar to "normal quality", emphasizing the usual characteristics.

routine quality

Highlights that quality checks are performed systematically.

everyday quality

Quality suitable for everyday use.

acceptable quality

Indicates that the quality meets the minimum requirements or standards.

serviceable quality

Quality that is adequate for its intended purpose.

ordinary quality

Emphasizes the common or unexceptional nature of the quality.

FAQs

How can I use "regular quality" in a sentence?

You can use "regular quality" to describe something that meets a standard level, neither exceptional nor poor. For example: "The product is of "regular quality", suitable for everyday use but not for professional applications."

What is a good substitute for "regular quality"?

Alternatives include "standard quality", "average quality", or "acceptable quality" depending on the context.

Is "regular quality" positive or negative?

"Regular quality" is generally neutral. It indicates that something is of an expected or typical standard, rather than being particularly good or bad. If you want to express higher or lower quality use words like "excellent" or "poor" instead.

What's the difference between "regular quality" and "high quality"?

"Regular quality" suggests a standard or typical level of quality, while "high quality" implies that something is superior or exceptional. The choice depends on the specific attribute you want to emphasize.