regarded as flawed

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "regarded as flawed" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing something that is perceived or considered to have defects or shortcomings. Example: "The theory was regarded as flawed due to its lack of empirical evidence."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

Heavily invested in Sanchez, a quarterback regarded as flawed, the Jets are adding a quarterback widely regarded as hopelessly flawed.

The New York Times - Sports

It was regarded as flawed, despite some undeniably great music.

The Guardian

He was responding in particular to one email from 2004 in which Phil Jones said of two papers he regarded as flawed: "I can't see either … being in the next [IPCC] report.

The Guardian

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

56 human-written examples

It was a design that many people would later come to regard as flawed.

The Guardian

Some of the new equipment purchased meets only the now-obsolete 1990 standard; other machines meet the 2002 standard, which experts also regard as flawed.

The Economist

Bachmann says the tax work gave her a deeper understanding of a tax code she came to regard as flawed.

Huffington Post

He took them to a bootmaker in Las Vegas or Reno, and made a videotape of the guy criticizing all the flaws — or what he regarded as flaws — and he sent the tape back to Lee with the boots".

The New Yorker

The Aristotelian elements are especially distinctive, given that Aristotle's thinking about morality was so strongly driven by his attempts to repair (what he regarded as) flaws in Plato's thinking.

SEP

These are welcome, too, especially when they hint at the ways in which personality traits that are commonly regarded as character flaws can be spurs to greatness.

The New York Times

In order to develop and articulate his philosophical system, Dewey first needed to expose what he regarded as the flaws of the existing tradition.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Again, this need not necessarily be regarded as a flaw of this theory.

SEP

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using the phrase "regarded as flawed", ensure you provide context or reasons why the subject is considered flawed. This adds credibility to your statement.

Common error

Avoid using "regarded as flawed" without providing supporting evidence or specific examples of the flaws. This can weaken your argument and make it seem subjective.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "regarded as flawed" functions as a descriptive adjective phrase. It typically modifies a noun, indicating that the noun is considered to have imperfections or weaknesses. Ludwig examples demonstrate this usage, showing how various entities (e.g., a quarterback, a design, a tax code) can be described using this phrase.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Science

30%

Encyclopedias

10%

Less common in

Formal & Business

7%

Wiki

7%

Reference

6%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "regarded as flawed" serves to describe something perceived as having imperfections or weaknesses. Ludwig AI's analysis shows its correct and usable nature in written English. While grammatically sound, its frequency is uncommon, appearing mainly in News & Media and scientific contexts. To enhance clarity, always substantiate the statement by explaining why something is "regarded as flawed". Alternatives such as "considered defective" or "deemed imperfect" can be used to subtly alter the tone or emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

considered defective

Directly replaces 'flawed' with 'defective', implying a more significant issue.

deemed imperfect

Replaces 'regarded as' with 'deemed', adding a formal tone, and 'flawed' with 'imperfect'.

seen as deficient

Uses 'seen as' instead of 'regarded as' and 'deficient' instead of 'flawed', indicating a lack of something necessary.

judged to be faulty

Emphasizes the act of judging and uses 'faulty' to suggest a problem with the design or construction.

viewed as substandard

Focuses on the idea that something doesn't meet the required standards, using 'substandard'.

regarded as inadequate

Substitutes "flawed" with "inadequate", highlighting the insufficiency or unsuitability for a particular purpose.

considered problematic

Uses a more general term, 'problematic', to indicate that something causes difficulties or objections.

thought to be weak

Replaces 'regarded as flawed' with a simpler phrase, 'thought to be weak', indicating a lack of strength or effectiveness.

believed to be unsound

Replaces "regarded as flawed" with "believed to be unsound", suggesting a lack of stability or validity.

looked upon as imperfect

Emphasizes the subjective perspective using 'looked upon as' and retains the idea of imperfection.

FAQs

How can I use "regarded as flawed" in a sentence?

You can use "regarded as flawed" to describe something that is perceived to have imperfections or weaknesses. For example, "The initial design was "regarded as flawed" due to its inefficiency".

What are some alternatives to "regarded as flawed"?

Alternatives include "considered defective", "deemed imperfect", or "seen as deficient". The best choice depends on the specific context and the nuance you want to convey.

Is it better to say "regarded as flawed" or "considered flawed"?

Both "regarded as flawed" and "considered flawed" are grammatically correct and have similar meanings. "Regarded as" might imply a more widespread or formally recognized perception, while "considered" can suggest a more personal assessment.

What's the difference between "regarded as flawed" and "simply flawed"?

"Regarded as flawed" indicates that there is a perception or opinion that something has flaws. "Simply flawed" states it as a fact, without necessarily indicating who holds that view. For example, an item can be "regarded as flawed" by experts, but it can't be only considered "simply flawed" without evidence or explicit consensus.