Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

referenced to

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "referenced to" is correct and can be used in written English.
You can use this phrase to say that something has been defined or described in relation to something else. For example, you might say: "The figures in this report are referenced to existing standards."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

The spectra were referenced to H3PO4.

Medial electrodes were referenced to ground.

The polymers were referenced to polystyrene standards.

Both were referenced to the Fz.

All energies are referenced to Fermi level.

NMR shifts were referenced to internal TMS or externally referenced to 85%% aq.

This was referenced to as the base (or original design).

Spectra were referenced to tetramethylsilane (TMS) at 0.0 ppm.

Recordings were referenced to Cz.

Science

Plosone

EOG signals were referenced to each other.

Science

Plosone

Channels were referenced to the nose.

Science

Plosone
Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "referenced to", ensure the reference point is clearly defined and easily understood by the reader. This avoids ambiguity and ensures accurate interpretation.

Common error

Avoid using "referenced to" when simply indicating a general relationship. Use it specifically when something is calibrated, standardized, or directly compared against a defined benchmark. For example, don't say 'The study referenced to climate change' when 'The study was related to climate change' is more appropriate.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "referenced to" functions as a prepositional phrase, indicating that a particular value, measurement, or finding is being related to a specific standard, baseline, or point of comparison. As Ludwig AI explains, the phrase is considered grammatically correct.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

100%

Less common in

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "referenced to" is a grammatically sound and frequently employed prepositional phrase, particularly within scientific and academic contexts, as Ludwig AI confirms. Its primary function is to clearly establish a relationship between a subject and a specific point of comparison or standard. When using this phrase, ensure that the reference point is well-defined to prevent ambiguity. Although commonly utilized, consider context-appropriate alternatives like "related to" or "compared to" to enhance clarity. Predominantly found in formal and scientific literature, "referenced to" serves to provide necessary context and facilitate accurate interpretation within various analytical and research-based discussions.

FAQs

How do I use "referenced to" in a sentence?

Use "referenced to" to indicate that something is being compared, calibrated, or related to a specific standard or point of reference. For example, 'All measurements were "referenced to" the control group'.

What are some alternatives to "referenced to"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "related to", "compared to", or "linked to". The best choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is it correct to say "referencing to" instead of "referenced to"?

While "referencing" can be used in other contexts, in this specific construction, "referenced to" is the correct and more common form when indicating a direct relationship to a reference point.

What's the difference between "referenced to" and "in relation to"?

"Referenced to" implies a more direct and specific comparison against a defined standard, while "in relation to" suggests a more general association or connection.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

83%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: