redundant to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "redundant to" is perfectly acceptable in written English.
You can use it to indicate that something is no longer necessary or that something repeats something that is already established. For example: "This additional step is redundant to what we have already done."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Encyclopedias

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

58 human-written examples

Would it be redundant to introduce the concept of redundancy at this point?

Huffington Post

It seems redundant to ask if she enjoys writing.

The Guardian - Books

It's redundant to hook them to a sewer line.

The New York Times

It is somewhat redundant to ask: but does God exist?

The Guardian - Opinion

It seemed to me redundant to have a single-genre prize for the best high literature".

The Guardian - Books

It might be slightly redundant to say that superhero movies have entered their baroque phase.

The Guardian - Film

Isn't it redundant to call anything you put in your mouth voluntarily "comfort food"?

The New York Times - Magazine

Would it be redundant to mention that the acting is awful?

The Guardian - Film

The Orpheus Chamber Orchestra is brave, though it almost seems redundant to say so.

The New York Times - Arts

They did not give up, it is almost redundant to say.

The Guardian - Sport

"What is redundant to them is first-class for most American museums".

The New York Times - Arts

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "redundant to" to streamline complex sentences by identifying and eliminating unnecessary repetitions or overlaps in meaning, thereby enhancing clarity and conciseness.

Common error

Avoid using "redundant to" when you actually mean 'similar to' or 'related to'. Redundancy implies unnecessary duplication, not just resemblance. Be careful in order to use the proper word in your sentences.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "redundant to" functions as a prepositional phrase indicating that something is unnecessary or superfluous in relation to something else. Ludwig provides numerous examples across various contexts showcasing its utility in identifying overlaps and duplication. This phrase often serves to streamline communication by pointing out what can be omitted without losing essential information.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

49%

Science

34%

Wiki

5%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

4%

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "redundant to" is a common and grammatically correct prepositional phrase used to indicate that something is unnecessary due to duplication. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's widely accepted in written English. Its frequent use across various contexts, including News & Media and Science, highlights its utility in identifying and critiquing overlaps. To use "redundant to" effectively, ensure the context clearly specifies what is being duplicated. Remember to avoid using "redundant to" when you mean 'similar to' or 'related to', as it implies a level of unnecessary repetition. By adhering to these guidelines, you can confidently and accurately incorporate "redundant to" into your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

superfluous for

Focuses on excess beyond what is needed, similar to redundancy.

unnecessary for

Highlights the lack of need, akin to something being redundant.

duplicative of

Emphasizes the act of repeating, suggesting redundancy through replication.

unrequired by

Highlights the absence of a requirement.

in excess of

Indicates a surplus, comparable to having something redundant.

dispensable for

Suggests something can be done without, similar to being redundant.

inessential for

Highlights the non-critical nature.

gratuitous for

Emphasizes that it is uncalled for or excessive.

unneeded for

Focuses on the lack of demand.

unnecessary to

Focuses on the lack of need.

FAQs

How do I use "redundant to" in a sentence?

Use "redundant to" to indicate that something is unnecessary because it duplicates something else. For example: "Adding another summary would be "redundant to" the introduction".

What can I say instead of "redundant to"?

You can use alternatives like "superfluous for", "unnecessary for", or "duplicative of", depending on the specific context.

Is it correct to say "redundant with" instead of "redundant to"?

While "redundant with" might be used in some contexts, "redundant to" is the more standard and widely accepted phrasing, especially in formal writing.

What's the difference between "redundant to" and "irrelevant to"?

"Redundant to" means something is unnecessary because it repeats something else. "Irrelevant to", on the other hand, means something is unrelated or doesn't apply to the matter at hand. They are not interchangeable.