redundant of

USAGE SUMMARY

The part of sentence 'redundant of' is not correct and it is not usable in written English.
It is not a phrase or an idiom. If you want to say that something is unnecessary or extra, you can say "redundant to" or use another phrase such as "not needed for" or "unnecessary for". For example, "The extra layer of security is redundant to our existing measures."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

11 human-written examples

Redundant; of course an anchorwoman is female.

The New York Times

The word "dollars" is redundant, of course.

The New York Times

I must confess the idea was wickedly tempting, for a second or two; after all, did he not champion the theatre, the most redundant of the major arts?

The Guardian - Books

However, numerous Afghan officials, opposition politicians and human rights activists loudly denounced the panel, calling it politically motivated and redundant of existing structures.

The New York Times

That last phrase might look redundant – of course a wake will be behind us – but Hall repeatedly and cannily turns her sentences to look backwards, because her book is profoundly about how the past makes the present, how memories and stories constitute our souls.

The Guardian - Books

A supporting positioning system that is redundant of the satellite signals is therefore necessary.

EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

48 human-written examples

Here, 'N i ' represents the number of redundant units of condensate extraction pump and boiler feed pump.

Journal of Industrial Engineering International

In this work we suggest a new approach to describe textural information in terms of redundant systems of functions.

Pattern Recognition

Hence removal of redundant region of the template should be accomplished before the matching procedure.

BioMed Research International

Network emulation can be understood in terms of redundant implementation of a particular network kinetics.

BMC Systems Biology

SNPs and CNVs represent non-redundant of genetic variation as manifested by the fact that there is only partial overlap between gene expression-CNV and gene expression-SNP correlation [8].

Plosone

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using the phrase "redundant of" in formal writing. Instead, opt for "redundant to" or other alternatives like "unnecessary for" for clarity and grammatical correctness.

Common error

Many writers mistakenly use "redundant of" due to its similarity to phrases like "independent of". Remember that "redundant" typically takes "to" as its preposition. Always double-check your preposition choice to ensure grammatical accuracy.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "redundant of" functions as a prepositional phrase aiming to describe something as unnecessary or superfluous in relation to something else. However, Ludwig indicates that it is grammatically incorrect, suggesting the correct form is "redundant to".

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

40%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, while the phrase "redundant of" appears in some sources, it is considered grammatically incorrect. Ludwig AI highlights that the correct form is "redundant to". It's intended purpose is to communicate that something is unnecessary or superfluous. Although found in news and scientific contexts, its questionable grammar suggests avoiding it in formal writing. Opt for grammatically sound alternatives like ""redundant to"", "unnecessary for", or "superfluous to" to maintain clarity and credibility in your writing.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

redundant to

This is the grammatically correct and most direct replacement, indicating something is unnecessary in relation to something else.

superfluous to

Similar to 'redundant to', but emphasizes excessiveness or being beyond what is required.

unnecessary for

Focuses on the lack of need for something, shifting the emphasis slightly from excess to absence of necessity.

not required for

A more direct and less formal way of saying something is not needed.

dispensable for

Highlights that something can be done without, emphasizing its lack of essentialness.

unneeded for

A simple and clear alternative, indicating that something is not needed.

excessive for

Indicates that something is more than necessary, often implying an undesirable surplus.

gratuitous for

Implies that something is uncalled for or unwarranted, going beyond what's appropriate.

pointless for

Emphasizes the lack of purpose or value in having something.

otiose for

A more formal and less common term suggesting idleness or ineffectiveness, implying something serves no practical purpose.

FAQs

What's the correct preposition to use with "redundant"?

The correct preposition to use with "redundant" is "to", not "of". Therefore, the correct phrase is "redundant to", as in, "The extra security measure is "redundant to" existing protocols".

What can I say instead of "redundant of"?

Since "redundant of" is not grammatically correct, you should use alternatives like ""redundant to"", "unnecessary for", or "superfluous to" depending on the context.

How can I use "redundant" correctly in a sentence?

To use "redundant" correctly, pair it with the preposition "to". For example: "Adding another backup system would be "redundant to" what we already have".

Is there a difference between "redundant to" and "unnecessary for"?

While both phrases indicate something isn't needed, ""redundant to"" implies that something else already fulfills the same purpose, making the addition superfluous. "Unnecessary for" simply means it isn't required, without necessarily implying duplication.