Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

reduce with

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase 'reduce with' is an acceptable phrase, and can be used in written English.
Example: We need to reduce our spending with the new budget.

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Costs will reduce with scale-up.

Postoperative complications reduce with increasing use of modified vulvectomies.

Autophagosome biogenesis takes place mainly in distal axons, close to presynaptic specializations7,8 and is suggested to reduce with age9.

Science & Research

Nature

The corresponding environmental flows progressively reduce with the decreasing level of ecosystem protection.

Both uniaxial compressive strength and elastic modulus of coal samples tend to reduce with temperature.

The specimen stiffness is observed to reduce with the amplitude of one-sided cyclic load.

Exergy loss and efficiency of the system reduce with an increase in the surrounding temperature.

The water level detection sensitivity was found to reduce with increasing thickness of the graphene diaphragm.

Defect density was observed to reduce with decreasing substrate surface finish.

However, the Sn II)–citrate complexes become more difficult to reduce with higher total citrate concentration and higher solution pH.

The results showed that gas compressibility factors reduce with increasing CO2 content in natural gasses and increase with increasing temperature.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "reduce with", ensure the context clearly specifies what the reduction is in relation to. This helps avoid ambiguity and ensures your message is easily understood.

Common error

Avoid assuming that because something reduces "with" another factor, there is a direct causal relationship. Correlation does not equal causation; further analysis may be needed to establish a genuine link.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reduce with" functions primarily as a prepositional phrase indicating a concurrent relationship between a decrease and another factor. Ludwig AI confirms its use across various contexts, as exemplified by sentences showing how a variable decreases in relation to another.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

2%

Reference

1%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "reduce with" signifies a concurrent decrease alongside another factor, frequently observed in scientific and news domains. Ludwig AI identifies it as an acceptable phrase for expressing correlated reductions. While generally versatile, contextual appropriateness and clarity are essential for effective usage. Consider alternative phrasings for specific nuances or formal contexts, ensuring that the relationship between the reduction and accompanying element is clearly articulated.

FAQs

How can I use "reduce with" in a sentence?

You can use "reduce with" to show a relationship between a decrease and another factor, as in "The risk would "reduce with" the decrease of replanting magnitude".

What's a good substitute for "reduce with"?

Consider alternatives like "decrease alongside", "decline with", or "diminish in conjunction with", depending on the specific nuance you wish to convey. Each of these carries a slightly different connotation regarding the relationship between the reduction and the accompanying factor.

Is it always appropriate to use "reduce with" in formal writing?

While "reduce with" is generally acceptable, consider whether a more precise term might be more appropriate, especially in academic or scientific writing. Alternatives like "decrease due to" or "decline as a function of" may provide greater clarity.

How does the meaning of "reduce with" differ from "reduce by"?

"Reduce with" indicates a concurrent relationship or condition, while "reduce by" specifies the quantity or extent of the reduction. For example, "reduce with" suggests a correlation, whereas "reduce by" indicates a specific amount of change.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.1/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: