recovered by

USAGE SUMMARY

"recovered by" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to describe a situation in which somebody is able to obtain something that they previously lost or didn't have. For example, "The lost family heirloom was recovered by the police."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Their bodies were recovered by divers.

Independent

The ball was recovered by Jason Bond.

The New York Times - Sports

It has been recovered by Julen Lopetegui.

The Guardian - Sport

It has since been recovered by police.

The Guardian

They were easily recovered by Lebanese police.

The Guardian

Stocks had recovered by May 2010, she said.

The New York Times

He fumble again, and it was recovered by New Orleans.

The New York Times - Sports

Twelve bodies of sailors were recovered by divers last fall.

The New York Times

Two were recovered by the junior defensive end Leo Dugan.

The New York Times - Sports

Janelle figured she would be fully recovered by then.

The New York Times - Magazine

The ball was recovered by safety John Lynch.

The New York Times - Sports

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "recovered by" in passive voice constructions to emphasize the agent responsible for the retrieval or restoration of something. For example, "The stolen painting was "recovered by" the police."

Common error

Avoid using "recovered by" in active voice constructions as it typically requires a passive structure for clarity. For instance, instead of saying "The police recovered by the painting", say "The painting was "recovered by" the police".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "recovered by" functions as a passive construction, indicating that an object or entity has been retrieved, regained, or restored through the actions of a specified agent. Ludwig provides numerous examples demonstrating this usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

44%

Science

42%

Wiki

3%

Less common in

Formal & Business

2%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "recovered by" is a commonly used phrase in English, typically functioning as a passive construction to indicate that something has been retrieved or restored by a specific agent. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is grammatically correct and applicable across various contexts, including news, science, and general writing. Its frequency suggests it's a versatile and readily understood expression, particularly useful for emphasizing the role of the retriever. Common alternatives include "regained by" or "restored by", each with slightly different nuances. When writing with the phrase, it's best to use the passive voice, ensuring clarity in attributing the act of recovery. As for its usage patterns, it is most frequent in "News & Media" and "Science" contexts.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

regained by

Stresses the act of getting something back after losing it.

revived by

Focuses on restoration to life or consciousness, differing from simple retrieval.

restored by

Emphasizes bringing something back to its original condition or state.

rediscovered by

Implies finding something that was previously lost or forgotten, adding a layer of discovery.

reclaimed by

Highlights the act of taking back something that was lost or seized, often with a sense of ownership.

reactivated by

Implies bringing something back into an active or operational state.

rehabilitated by

Focuses on restoring someone or something to a healthy or useful state after a period of decline.

reconvened by

Suggests a meeting or assembly was brought back together by someone, applicable in specific organizational contexts.

recouped by

Implies recovering a loss or deficit, often in a financial or strategic context.

reconstituted by

Suggests the process of rebuilding or reforming something that was disassembled or broken down.

FAQs

How is "recovered by" used in a sentence?

"Recovered by" is used to indicate that something lost or taken has been found or regained by someone. For instance, "The artifact was "recovered by" the archaeologists".

What are some alternatives to "recovered by"?

Alternatives include "regained by", "restored by", or "reclaimed by depending" on the specific context.

Which is correct, "recovered by" or "recovered through"?

"Recovered by" indicates the agent responsible for the recovery, whereas "recovered through" suggests the method or means by which something was recovered. For example, "The data was "recovered by" the IT team" versus "The data was recovered through advanced software".

What's the difference between "recovered by" and "recovered from"?

"Recovered by" indicates who or what did the recovering, while "recovered from" indicates what was overcome or where something was retrieved. For example, "The funds were "recovered by" the authorities" versus "The documents were recovered from the wreckage".