Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
reconstructed with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
The phrase "reconstructed with" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when describing something that has been rebuilt or restored using specific materials or methods. Example: "The ancient artifact was reconstructed with the original materials found at the site."
✓ Grammatically correct
Science
News & Media
Alternative expressions(4)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
60 human-written examples
The data were reconstructed with different reconstruction methods.
Science
Volumetric data were reconstructed with segmented reconstruction.
Science
Volumetric data were reconstructed with half or segmented reconstruction.
Science
Scans were reconstructed with a high-frequency reconstruction algorithm.
Science
Parkland The deaths of JFK and his assassin reconstructed, with help from Zac Efron.
News & Media
The core was four French cloisters reconstructed, with varying degrees of accuracy, from salvaged parts.
News & Media
There was more, much of it painstakingly reconstructed with the aid of computers.
News & Media
The right side of Bang's face was reconstructed with wax, but it was recognizable.
News & Media
The house that Gérard has reconstructed with his wife is like a small, removed Eden.
News & Media
In others, historical events are reconstructed with uncanny immediacy and fidelity.
News & Media
Today, about 200 homes have been built or reconstructed, with 1,100 more in the works.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
When using "reconstructed with", ensure that the materials or methods used in the reconstruction are clearly specified to provide context and clarity.
Common error
Avoid using "reconstructed with" without specifying what the object was reconstructed with. For example, instead of saying "The building was reconstructed with modern materials", be specific: "The building was reconstructed with steel and reinforced concrete."
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "reconstructed with" functions as a verb phrase, where "reconstructed" is the past participle of the verb 'reconstruct' and 'with' introduces the means or materials used in the reconstruction. As Ludwig AI shows, it commonly describes how something was rebuilt or restored.
Frequent in
Science
64%
News & Media
34%
Formal & Business
2%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
0%
Wiki
0%
Reference
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
The phrase "reconstructed with" is a versatile verb phrase commonly used to describe how something has been rebuilt or restored using specific materials or methods. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and finds frequent application in scientific and news contexts. When using "reconstructed with", it is essential to specify the materials or methods for clarity. Alternatives include "rebuilt using" and "restored with", offering similar meanings with slight nuances. Overall, "reconstructed with" is a valuable phrase for providing detailed descriptions of rebuilding or restoration processes.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
rebuilt using
Focuses specifically on the action of building again, emphasizing the act of construction.
restored with
Emphasizes returning something to its original condition using particular materials or techniques.
repaired through
Highlights the act of fixing something that is damaged, using a specific method or tool.
recreated with
Focuses on making something new again, often implying a replica or imitation.
reassembled incorporating
Highlights a process of putting something back together, integrating new or existing parts.
reconstituted employing
Suggests restoring something to its former state by adding a liquid or other element, utilizing specific techniques.
reestablished utilizing
Emphasizes bringing something back into existence or a former state, making use of particular resources or methods.
redeveloped implementing
Implies improving or enhancing something through a development process, putting specific strategies into action.
remodeled applying
Indicates changing the structure or form of something, putting particular techniques into effect.
rearranged featuring
Highlights a new order or organization with particular elements taking prominence.
FAQs
How can I use "reconstructed with" in a sentence?
Use "reconstructed with" to describe something that has been rebuilt or restored using specific materials or methods. For example: "The ancient artifact was reconstructed with the original materials found at the site."
What are some alternatives to "reconstructed with"?
You can use alternatives such as "rebuilt using", "restored with", or "repaired through" depending on the specific context.
Is it correct to say "rebuilt with" instead of "reconstructed with"?
Yes, "rebuilt with" is a valid alternative. "Reconstructed" often implies a more complex or historical restoration, while "rebuilt" is a more general term for building something again.
What is the difference between "reconstructed with" and "restored with"?
"Reconstructed with" implies rebuilding something, potentially with new materials or a different design, while "restored with" suggests returning something to its original condition using similar or the same materials.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
82%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested