Used and loved by millions
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.
Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com
recognized with
Grammar usage guide and real-world examplesUSAGE SUMMARY
This phrase is correct and usable in written English.
"Recognized with" indicates that someone has been acknowledged, praised, or awarded for something. For example: "He was recognized with an award for his outstanding work".
✓ Grammatically correct
News & Media
Science
Wiki
Alternative expressions(20)
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Human-verified examples from authoritative sources
Exact Expressions
57 human-written examples
His contributions were recognized with numerous awards.
News & Media
That planning recognized, with unusual prescience, that consumers would be focused on value this season.
News & Media
I recognized with a thrill of repugnance an old red sweater of Ruth's, angora-fuzzy.
News & Media
Mrs. Callner Miller's dedication was recognized with an honorary fellowship from the Technion in 1984.
News & Media
At the agency's annual meeting several months ago, Andy was recognized with the Founder's Award.
News & Media
The Times is proud to be recognized with the magazine industry's greatest honor.
News & Media
Marcus Gardley was recognized with the PEN/Laura Pels Foundation Award for a mid-career dramatist.
News & Media
Her work was recognized with photography awards and a 1955 George Polk Award, among others.
News & Media
Participating groups are recognized with a sign along the road they adopt.
News & Media
Nineteen teachers chosen by the scholars will also be recognized, with $3,000 grants.
News & Media
Mr. Coler, who developed some of California's largest hotels, was recognized with a Technion honorary fellowship.
News & Media
Expert writing Tips
Best practice
Use "recognized with" when you want to highlight that someone or something has received formal acknowledgment, praise, or an award for their achievements or qualities. Ensure the context clearly indicates the specific recognition being given.
Common error
Avoid using incorrect prepositions after "recognized". The correct form is "recognized with", not "recognized by" or "recognized for", unless the sentence structure is significantly altered to accommodate those prepositions. "Recognized by" usually refers to the recognition being made by an entity, not for an achievement.
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested
Linguistic Context
The phrase "recognized with" functions as a verb phrase indicating that someone or something has received acknowledgment, praise, or a specific honor. As Ludwig AI explains, it is correctly used across a variety of contexts.
Frequent in
News & Media
42%
Science
39%
Wiki
13%
Less common in
Encyclopedias
2%
Formal & Business
2%
Academia
0%
Ludwig's WRAP-UP
In summary, "recognized with" is a common and grammatically correct phrase used to indicate that someone or something has received formal acknowledgment, praise, or an award. As Ludwig AI explains, its usage spans various contexts, including news, science, and general writing. The phrase is most frequently found in news and scientific sources. Related phrases include "honored with" and "awarded with", each carrying slightly different nuances. When writing, ensure the preposition "with" is correctly used, and consider whether "recognized for" might be more appropriate depending on the intended meaning.
More alternative expressions(10)
Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:
honored with
Emphasizes respect and high esteem. Focuses on the honor bestowed rather than simple recognition.
awarded with
Specifically implies receiving an award or prize, narrowing the scope of recognition.
bestowed upon
Suggests a formal giving or conferring of something, often an honor or award.
credited with
Indicates that someone is given acknowledgment for an achievement or contribution.
acknowledged for
Highlights the act of acknowledging someone's merit or achievement.
lauded for
Emphasizes praise and public acclaim, indicating significant approval.
distinguished by
Focuses on unique qualities or characteristics that set someone or something apart.
celebrated for
Indicates widespread appreciation and rejoicing for accomplishments.
associated with
Highlights a connection or link to something, without necessarily implying praise.
identified by
Focuses on recognition through specific attributes or characteristics.
FAQs
How can I use "recognized with" in a sentence?
You can use "recognized with" to indicate that someone or something has been formally acknowledged or rewarded for an achievement. For instance, "Her work was "recognized with" a prestigious award".
What are some alternatives to saying "recognized with"?
Depending on the context, alternatives include "honored with", "awarded with", or "credited with". The choice depends on the specific nuance you want to convey.
Is it correct to say "recognized for" instead of "recognized with"?
While "recognized with" typically refers to receiving an award or honor, "recognized for" highlights the specific quality or achievement that led to the recognition. Both are grammatically correct, but they convey different meanings.
What's the difference between "recognized with" and "acknowledged with"?
"Recognized with" usually implies a formal award or honor, while "acknowledged with" suggests a more general form of acknowledgment or appreciation. For example, someone might be "recognized with" an award but "acknowledged with" a simple thank you.
Editing plus AI, all in one place.
Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.
Table of contents
Usage summary
Human-verified examples
Expert writing tips
Linguistic context
Ludwig's wrap-up
Alternative expressions
FAQs
Source & Trust
84%
Authority and reliability
4.5/5
Expert rating
Real-world application tested