recognized to

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "recognized to" is not correct and does not convey a clear meaning in written English.
It is not commonly used and may lead to confusion; a more appropriate phrase would be needed to express the intended idea. Example: "The committee recognized the need to improve communication."

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Many were recognized to be periodic.

Encyclopedia Britannica

"Wastewater" has always been recognized to have some value.

The New York Times

Intervention, however, should be recognized to include multilateral actions, nonviolent applications and long-term policies.

The New York Times

One I recognized to be the old man who had opened the door.

The New Yorker

As a strong-immuno-activator, the injection has been recognized to prevent different malignant epidemics".

Independent

Natriuretic peptides are recognized to increase endothelial permeability [45].

Sports Medicine - Open

Then, the anomalous light transmission is recognized to take place.

Journal of Theoretical and Applied Physics

Selective PDE3B inhibitors were recognized to prevent oocyte maturation.

Arabian Journal of Chemistry

Sterols are now recognized to ligate several immune receptors.

Trends in Immunology

Anatomic variants must be recognized to customize surgical procedures.

Facial Plastic Surgery Clinics of North America

Coatings under cathodic protection (CP) have been recognized to prevent/mitigate potential pipeline corrosion.

Journal of Loss Prevention in the Process Industries

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Instead of using "recognized to", opt for stronger and more grammatically sound alternatives like "acknowledged to be", "identified as", or "considered to be" to ensure clarity and correctness in your writing.

Common error

Be cautious of using "recognized to" in contexts where the "to be" is implied. Often, a more concise phrasing such as "is recognized as" or "has been recognized as" provides greater clarity and avoids unnecessary wordiness.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "recognized to" functions primarily as a passive verb construction, indicating that something is being acknowledged or identified. However, Ludwig AI indicates that this construction is often grammatically weak and can be improved.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

60%

News & Media

28%

Encyclopedias

2%

Less common in

Wiki

2%

Formal & Business

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "recognized to" frequently appears across various domains, particularly in science and news media, yet it's flagged by Ludwig AI as grammatically weak. While commonly used, this construction often benefits from stronger, more precise alternatives such as "acknowledged to be", "identified as", or "considered to be". These alternatives enhance clarity and grammatical correctness. Writers should strive for conciseness and avoid redundancy, ensuring the chosen phrase effectively communicates the intended meaning. To sum up, while prevalent, "recognized to" is not the most effective or grammatically sound choice and should be replaced with a more suitable alternative.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

acknowledged to be

Replaces "recognized" with "acknowledged", emphasizing acceptance or awareness of a fact or situation.

identified as

Replaces "recognized" with "identified", focusing on the act of pinpointing or determining something's nature or identity.

considered to be

Emphasizes the act of thinking about something in a particular way, viewing it with a specific quality or characteristic.

understood to be

Suggests a shared or common comprehension of something's nature or state.

known to be

Highlights that something is widely accepted or established as a certain fact.

deemed to be

Implies a formal judgement or assessment leading to a particular conclusion.

regarded as

Indicates how something is viewed or perceived by a particular group or person.

accepted as

Focuses on the widespread agreement or belief in something's validity or nature.

established as

Highlights that something has been firmly proven or recognized over time.

perceived as

Emphasizes the subjective impression or understanding of something.

FAQs

What are some alternatives to "recognized to"?

Alternatives include "acknowledged to be", "identified as", "considered to be", and "known to be", depending on the specific context.

Is "recognized to" grammatically correct?

While frequently used, "recognized to" is often considered grammatically weak. Using alternatives like "recognized as" or "acknowledged to be" provides greater clarity and grammatical strength.

How can I use "recognized to be" in a sentence?

It's generally better to rephrase sentences using alternatives like "acknowledged to be" or "considered to be". For example, instead of "It is recognized to be important", use "It is acknowledged to be important".

What's the difference between "recognized to be" and "recognized as"?

"Recognized as" directly links the subject with a quality or attribute, while "recognized to be" can sound awkward and less direct. "Recognized as" is often the more concise and grammatically sound option.