recognized of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "recognized of" is not correct in written English.
It is not usable in any context as it does not conform to standard English grammar. Example: "He was recognized of his contributions to the project." (This is incorrect; it should be "recognized for.")

⚠ May contain grammatical issues

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

45 human-written examples

The poet Kögltin Dawa David Kugultinovv) is perhaps the most recognized of 20th-century Kalmyk writers.

Encyclopedia Britannica

The most recognized of the programs is "Project Independence", a revolutionary empowerment program that allow seniors to remain in their homes.

The New York Times

It expanded abroad, establishing itself and its red, black and white Marlboro logo as one of the most universally recognized of commercial symbols.

The New York Times

The framers recognized, of course, that a candidate's religion (or lack thereof) would enter political debate, and they were prohibiting only a formal test for taking office.

The New York Times - Magazine

Among the most widely recognized of Jharkhand's dances is chhau, an elaborate masked dance of the southeastern region, particularly the Saraikela and East Singhbhum districts.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Humans exhale lots of carbon dioxide — the most widely recognized of the many likely mosquito attractants, including body heat and odors.

The New York Times - Science

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

15 human-written examples

She recognized none of them.

The New Yorker

I recognized one of them.

The New York Times - Magazine

The app recognized five of the six.

The New York Times - Tech

He thus recognized structures of imperial origin.

Encyclopedia Britannica

Choose the path of recognized health professionals.

WikiHow

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Avoid using "recognized of" in your writing. Instead, use the correct form "recognized for" or other suitable alternatives like "known for" or "acknowledged for" depending on the intended meaning.

Common error

A common mistake is using "of" instead of "for" after "recognized". Ensure you use the correct preposition to maintain grammatical accuracy and clarity in your writing.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "recognized of" is grammatically incorrect and does not function properly in English sentence structure. It should be replaced with a correct prepositional phrase such as "recognized for". According to Ludwig AI, the phrase is not usable in any context as it does not conform to standard English grammar.

Expression frequency: Missing

Frequent in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Science

0%

News & Media

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "recognized of" is grammatically incorrect and should not be used in writing. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase does not conform to standard English grammar. The correct and widely accepted alternative is "recognized for", which effectively conveys that someone or something is acknowledged or known for a particular attribute or achievement. Other alternatives include "acknowledged for" and "known for", depending on the specific context and intended meaning. Always ensure the correct preposition is used to maintain clarity and grammatical accuracy.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

recognized for

Replaces 'of' with 'for', indicating the reason or attribute for which someone is recognized.

acknowledged for

Substitutes 'recognized' with 'acknowledged', emphasizing formal acceptance or awareness.

known for

Uses 'known' instead of 'recognized', highlighting widespread familiarity or reputation.

distinguished by

Emphasizes unique qualities that set something apart and make it recognizable.

noted for

Indicates that something is remarkable or worthy of attention.

celebrated for

Highlights achievements or qualities that are publicly praised and honored.

respected for

Focuses on earning admiration and high regard due to certain attributes or actions.

regarded as

Indicates how something is generally perceived or considered.

identified by

Stresses the means by which something is uniquely recognized or classified.

remembered for

Highlights qualities or events that cause something to be kept in memory.

FAQs

How should I correctly use the word "recognized" in a sentence?

The word "recognized" is typically followed by "for" to indicate the reason or attribute for which someone or something is recognized. For example, "She was recognized for her outstanding contributions."

What can I say instead of "recognized of"?

Instead of "recognized of", you can use alternatives like "recognized for", "acknowledged for", or "known for" depending on the context.

Which is correct: "recognized of" or "recognized for"?

"Recognized for" is the correct usage. "Recognized of" is grammatically incorrect.

What's the difference between "recognized for" and "acknowledged for"?

"Recognized for" implies that someone or something is generally known or identified by a particular quality or achievement, while "acknowledged for" suggests a formal acceptance or recognition of something.