Ai Feedback
Exact(6)
The EBV strain causing LPD is of either donor or recipient origin, however, available data are limited to only a small number of cases.
In the larger NI of the allograft stents (n = 10) 81.5±4.2% of the cells were of recipient origin.
Examination of nine native carotid artery samples (5 female and 4 male) revealed that 96.5±6.6% of the cells were of recipient origin (Figure 4F).
By 6 weeks, the vast majority (>90%) of lymphatic vessels present in the distal and proximal margins were of recipient origin.
The superb histological detection quality of hPLAP permits a clear distinction between wild-type cells of recipient origin and hPLAP-expressing cells of donor origin (Fig. 3D F).
Three months after bone marrow transfer, Langerin staining of epidermal sheets (Supplementary Fig S4B) and epidermal cell suspensions (Supplementary Fig S4C) confirmed that LCs remained mostly of recipient origin, although a small proportion appeared to be derived from the bone marrow graft, in accordance with recent results (Nagao et al, 2012).
Similar(54)
The absolute cell numbers of recipient-origin stem cells (CD45.2+ KLS cells) and donor derived stem cells (CD45.1+ KLS cells) in the spleen were similarly determined.
The absolute cell numbers of recipient-origin stem cells (CD45.2+ KLS cells) and donor derived stem cells (CD45.1+ KLS cells) in the spleen and in the marrow were determined, as described above.
To determine the mobilization of recipient's residual marrow stem cells from marrow, we measured the recipient-origin stem cells (CD45.2+ KLS cells) in the marrow by flow cytometry as described above.
In addition, we collected one femur and one tibia from each mouse and measured total nucleated marrow cells, total donor-derived CD45.1+ KLS hematopoietic stem cells (c-kit+ Lin− Sca-1+ cells) and recipient-origin CD45.2+ KLS cells.
The total nucleated cells, the donor-derived cells (CD45.1+ cells), and the recipient-origin cells (CD45.2+ cells) in the peripheral blood were measured using multi-color flow cytometry analyses.
Write better and faster with AI suggestions while staying true to your unique style.
Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak
CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com