received no response

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "received no response" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use this phrase when you are referring to an instance where somebody has asked a question or requested something, and the person who they asked has not responded. For example: "She sent an email requesting information, but she received no response."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

55 human-written examples

He received no response.

The New York Times

She received no response.

The New Yorker

(I received no response).

The New York Times

They received no response.

The Guardian

Yet he received no response.

The New York Times

He has received no response.

The New York Times

We've received no response from Martens.

The New York Times

He said he received no response.

The New York Times - Sports

To date, he has received no response.

The Guardian

They received no response, she said.

The New York Times

Mr. Couto said he received no response.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "received no response" to clearly and professionally indicate a lack of reply or acknowledgment, particularly in formal communication and reports.

Common error

Avoid using "received no response" when the lack of response implies active ignoring or intentional neglect. Instead, consider phrases like "was ignored" or "went unheeded" to convey the intentional aspect.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "received no response" functions as a predicate, indicating the state of not getting an answer. It commonly appears after a subject denoting someone who expected a reply, as seen in Ludwig's examples. The phrase describes the lack of communication from the other party.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

100%

Less common in

Formal & Business

0%

Science

0%

Academia

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "received no response" is a commonly used and grammatically correct phrase to indicate a lack of reply to a communication. As indicated by Ludwig, it is frequently found in news and media sources, and it maintains a neutral to formal tone. While it's a straightforward way to convey that a reply was not received, understanding its implications and potential alternatives allows for more nuanced and effective writing. This phrase is best used when a neutral tone is desired, focusing on the absence of a response without explicitly assigning blame or intent. For situations needing a more expressive tone, consider alternative phrases like "was met with silence" or "the inquiry was ignored".

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

got no answer

This alternative is more informal and direct, implying a lack of any communication in return.

heard nothing back

This is a more casual and conversational way of saying there was no response.

did not get a reply

This alternative uses a more active voice and emphasizes the absence of a reply.

the inquiry was ignored

Directly states that the inquiry was deliberately overlooked.

had no acknowledgment

This alternative highlights the lack of any form of recognition or confirmation.

the message went unanswered

This focuses on the message not being addressed, highlighting neglect or oversight.

was met with silence

This alternative uses a metaphorical expression to describe the absence of a response.

it went unheeded

Implies that the request or message was ignored or disregarded.

no reply was forthcoming

A more formal and somewhat passive way to indicate the absence of a response.

there was no reaction

This broadens the meaning to include any kind of reaction, not just a verbal or written reply.

FAQs

How can I use "received no response" in a sentence?

You can use "received no response" to indicate a lack of reply after a request or inquiry. For example, "I emailed the company but "received no response"."

What are some alternatives to "received no response"?

Alternatives include "got no answer", "did not get a reply", or "was met with silence", depending on the context.

Is "received no response" formal or informal?

"Received no response" is generally considered neutral to formal. It's suitable for professional and academic writing. More informal options might be "didn't hear back" or "got no reply".

Can "received no response" imply something negative?

Yes, depending on the context, it can imply that the recipient was dismissive, uninterested, or simply too busy to reply. The tone is usually neutral, but the implication depends on the situation.