received less attention

USAGE SUMMARY

"received less attention" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it to talk about something or someone that did not get as much focus as something or someone else. For example, "The new student received less attention from the teacher than the other students."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

Places farther south and east received less attention.

The New York Times

– have until recently received less attention than they merit.

The Guardian

The sun-faded paint has received less attention.

The New York Times

The impact on them has received less attention.

The Guardian

But certain crucial elements have received less attention.

The Guardian

There's another issue, though, that has received less attention.

The New Yorker

Childhood cancer has received less attention and cash.

The Economist

The return of members of Ben Ali's regime has received less attention.

The New Yorker

The complaint from Axtel against Alestra and Avantel has received less attention.

The New York Times

One, though — the privatization of public education, in the name of reform — has received less attention.

The New Yorker

The temptation was to brood over Zidane, but others can be glad they received less attention.

The Guardian - Sport

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "received less attention", ensure it's clear what the subject is being compared to. Provide context to highlight the disparity in attention.

Common error

Avoid using "received less attention" without specifying what it is being compared to. For example, instead of saying "The problem received less attention", clarify with "The problem received less attention compared to the budget deficit."

Linguistic Context

The phrase "received less attention" functions as a verb phrase. It typically indicates that a particular subject has been given less focus, consideration, or importance than another. Ludwig AI confirms its correct and widespread usage.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

News & Media

53%

Science

45%

Formal & Business

1%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "received less attention" is a versatile phrase used to express a comparative lack of focus or emphasis. As Ludwig AI indicates, it is grammatically correct and commonly used in both formal and informal settings. Its frequent appearance in news and scientific contexts underscores its utility in highlighting imbalances or neglected aspects. When employing this phrase, ensure clarity by specifying what the subject is being compared to, avoiding vague comparisons. For alternative phrasing, consider "attracted less focus" or "was overlooked", depending on the intended nuance.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

attracted less focus

Focuses on the lack of active drawing of attention, rather than a passive receiving.

garnered less interest

Implies a lack of enthusiasm or curiosity, suggesting a different underlying cause for the reduced attention.

was given less consideration

Highlights a deficiency in thoughtful deliberation or evaluation.

was overlooked

Suggests a complete failure to notice or acknowledge something.

was not prioritized

Indicates a deliberate decision to assign lower importance or urgency.

did not get as much coverage

Refers specifically to media or reporting, implying a lack of public visibility.

remained under the radar

Conveys a sense of being intentionally concealed or unnoticed.

was relegated to the background

Suggests a deliberate act of pushing something into a less prominent position.

lacked sufficient emphasis

Highlights a failure to give something the necessary importance or prominence.

flew under the radar

Indicates something was unoticed by many, possibly intentionally

FAQs

How can I use "received less attention" in a sentence?

Use "received less attention" to indicate that something was not focused on as much as something else. For example: "The environmental impact assessment "received less attention" than the economic benefits."

What are some alternatives to "received less attention"?

You can use alternatives like "attracted less focus", "garnered less interest", or "was overlooked", depending on the specific context you wish to convey.

Which is correct: "received less attention" or "received fewer attention"?

"Received less attention" is correct because "attention" is an uncountable noun. "Fewer" is used with countable nouns. Therefore, it should be "received less attention", not "received fewer attention".

What's the difference between "received less attention" and "was ignored"?

"Received less attention" implies a relative lack of focus compared to something else, while "was ignored" suggests a complete lack of attention. For example, a minor detail in a report might have "received less attention", while a critical piece of evidence may have been "was ignored".