Used and loved by millions

Since I tried Ludwig back in 2017, I have been constantly using it in both editing and translation. Ever since, I suggest it to my translators at ProSciEditing.

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak quote

Justyna Jupowicz-Kozak

CEO of Professional Science Editing for Scientists @ prosciediting.com

MitStanfordHarvardAustralian Nationa UniversityNanyangOxford

received funding

Grammar usage guide and real-world examples

USAGE SUMMARY

"received funding" is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
It can be used when discussing a person, organization, or project that was given money for a certain purpose such as research, a project, or general expenses. For example: "The research project received funding from the National Science Foundation."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Formal & Business

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

60 human-written examples

"He received funding from them.

News & Media

The New York Times

The site would also disclose which items received funding.

News & Media

The New York Times

This study received funding from our department.

The project received funding from Scottish Natural Heritage.

News & Media

BBC

Oliver Werz received funding from Bionorica SE, Germany.

A.V. has received funding from Astrazeneca as a co-investigator.

None of the authors received funding for this study.

Most received funding from two to five sources.

Dr. Kister received funding for research activities from EMD Serono.

O. Werz received funding from Bionorica SE, Germany.

A Hayes and D Chan received funding from Sydney Vital.

Show more...

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When writing about research or projects, use "received funding" to clearly indicate where the financial resources came from. This adds transparency and credibility to your work.

Common error

Avoid overusing the passive voice when using "received funding". Instead of "The project was received funding by...", opt for "The project received funding from...". This makes the sentence more direct and engaging.

Antonio Rotolo, PhD - Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Antonio Rotolo, PhD

Digital Humanist | Computational Linguist | CEO @Ludwig.guru

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Linguistic Context

The phrase "received funding" functions as a verb phrase indicating that a person, project, or organization has been given financial resources. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a common and acceptable way to describe the act of getting money for a specific purpose. Many examples in Ludwig showcase its use in scientific and news contexts.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

69%

News & Media

24%

Formal & Business

7%

Less common in

Wiki

1%

Reference

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "received funding" is a verb phrase used to indicate that someone or something has been given financial support. Ludwig AI validates its correct grammatical standing and widespread usage. Its primary purpose is to inform about the allocation of financial resources, often in contexts requiring transparency and accountability. As shown by Ludwig's examples, the phrase appears most frequently in scientific publications, news reports, and business documents. When using this phrase, prioritize direct and active sentence structures to maintain clarity. Semantically related alternatives include "obtained financing" and "secured funding", offering nuanced ways to express the same core idea.

FAQs

How can I use "received funding" in a sentence?

You can use "received funding" to describe when a project, organization, or individual has been given financial support. For example, "The study "received funding" from the National Science Foundation."

What are some alternatives to "received funding"?

Alternatives include "obtained financing", "secured funding", or "was granted funds". The best choice depends on the specific context.

Is it better to say "received funding from" or "was funded by"?

Both phrases are grammatically correct, but "received funding from" emphasizes the act of receiving, while "was funded by" emphasizes the source of the funding. The choice depends on the desired emphasis.

What does it mean when a research paper says it "received funding"?

It means that the research project was financially supported by an external source, such as a government agency, a private foundation, or a corporation. This disclosure is important for transparency and potential conflict of interest considerations.

ChatGPT power + Grammarly precisionChatGPT power + Grammarly precision
ChatGPT + Grammarly

Editing plus AI, all in one place.

Stop switching between tools. Your AI writing partner for everything—polishing proposals, crafting emails, finding the right tone.

Source & Trust

82%

Authority and reliability

4.5/5

Expert rating

Real-world application tested

Most frequent sentences: