reasonably thorough

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "reasonably thorough" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to describe a level of detail or completeness that is adequate but not excessive, often in contexts like reports, analyses, or evaluations. Example: "The review of the project was reasonably thorough, covering all major aspects without going into unnecessary detail."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

12 human-written examples

The jobs are all listed, sometimes with reasonably thorough descriptions.

The New York Times

The House passed a flawed, though reasonably thorough, bill last December.

The New York Times

It is possible to set down a reasonably thorough set of characteristics that bioengineered materials have in common.

Surface Science

It was a reasonably thorough body search.

BBC

A reasonably thorough account of this is given in our book [3].

Complex Analysis and its Synergies

Mr McGurk described the report's conclusion that "on the balance of probabilities" the police conducted a "reasonably thorough investigation" as "patently ridiculous".

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

48 human-written examples

Sounds pretty thorough.

The New York Times

While still at an early stage of being assessed, it is thought that the pair are considered to have "reasonably good" grounds for a thorough assessment of potential legal action.

The Guardian

Some counties' building inspectors are structural engineers by trade, and if you go in with some reasonably drawn-up plans and a thorough understanding of the concepts listed above, there's a good chance they will help you out.

HuffPost

Although research regarding financial inclusion through mobile and Internet banking in African countries has been reasonably extensive, the literature has not been equally thorough in addressing financial inclusion in the context of SAARC countries.

Financial Innovation

It's taken the longest of the inquiries, and would appear to be the most thorough, although there are areas in which you could reasonably argue it could have been more thorough - indeed the team admitted as much, but pointed out that it actually had to finish and reach a conclusion sometime.

BBC

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "reasonably thorough" when you want to convey that something has been done with a good level of detail and completeness, without being excessive. It suggests a balance between being comprehensive and efficient.

Common error

While "reasonably thorough" is versatile, avoid overusing it in very formal or academic writing where a more precise term like "sufficiently comprehensive" or "adequately detailed" might be more appropriate.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "reasonably thorough" functions as a modifier, specifically an adverb-adjective combination, to describe the extent or quality of something. As Ludwig AI says, it indicates a good level of detail and completeness. The adverb "reasonably" softens the adjective "thorough", suggesting a balance between comprehensiveness and practicality.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

42%

Science

33%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Academia

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "reasonably thorough" is a common and grammatically correct way to describe something that has been done with a good level of detail and completeness, without being excessive. As Ludwig AI confirms, it's a versatile phrase suitable for various contexts, particularly in news and media and scientific writing. While it maintains a neutral register, it's important to select more precise terms in highly formal contexts. Related phrases such as "sufficiently comprehensive" or "adequately detailed" can offer alternative nuances. Using "reasonably thorough" effectively involves understanding its implications for balance and efficiency in conveying information.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

sufficiently comprehensive

Emphasizes the completeness and broad scope of the action.

adequately detailed

Focuses on the level of detail provided being suitable for the purpose.

quite exhaustive

Suggests a very complete and detailed approach, possibly more so than "reasonably thorough".

fairly meticulous

Highlights the careful and precise nature of the action or item.

acceptably complete

Indicates a level of completeness that meets expectations or requirements.

appropriately in-depth

Emphasizes that the depth of the action or item is suitable for the situation.

suitably extensive

Highlights the breadth or range of the action or item is appropriate.

moderately detailed

Suggests a mid-level of detail, implying not overly detailed but sufficient.

passably exhaustive

Implies that the approach or action is almost exhaustive, suggesting a level of completeness.

serviceably complete

Indicates that the level of completeness is functional and fulfills the immediate need.

FAQs

How can I use "reasonably thorough" in a sentence?

You can use "reasonably thorough" to describe an investigation, a report, or any process that has been carried out with a good level of detail. For example, "The investigation was "reasonably thorough", covering all key aspects of the incident."

What are some alternatives to "reasonably thorough"?

Alternatives include "sufficiently comprehensive", "adequately detailed", or "fairly meticulous", depending on the specific nuance you want to convey.

Is "reasonably thorough" formal or informal?

The phrase "reasonably thorough" is considered neutral in tone. It is suitable for both formal and informal contexts, but in very formal or academic writing, a more precise term may be preferred.

What does "reasonably thorough" imply about the level of detail?

It implies that the level of detail is good and complete, but not necessarily exhaustive. It suggests a balance between being comprehensive and efficient, indicating that the task was performed with due diligence but without unnecessary elaboration.