real-world studies

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "real-world studies" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used to refer to research or investigations that take place in actual, practical settings rather than controlled environments. Example: "The findings from the real-world studies provide valuable insights into how the treatment performs outside of clinical trials."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

59 human-written examples

Real-world studies from hundreds, if not thousands, of field scientists around the globe and across a broad range of disciplines confirm that climate is changing due to human impact.

The New York Times

Dr. Litten said there were not enough real-world studies yet to determine how effective the drugs were in "naturalistic" settings, or how much overlap there was between the two groups who responded to each drug.

The New York Times - Health

What's more, he says, the finding increases the gap between models and real-world studies.

Science Magazine

The design of real-world studies to test whether Ebola vaccines work has similarly triggered impassioned discussions.

Science Magazine

Such uncertainties have fallen with the following real-world studies with OnabotulinumtoxinA for CM where all treated patients were suffering from MO.

The Journal of Headache and Pain

Rechtschaffner matrices allow evaluation of all main factors and two-factor interactions, which in many real-world studies are of practical significance.

Analytica Chimica Acta

Thus, the discriminant validity of DSM-4 bereavement exclusion for the diagnosis of MDE has been studied in three naturalistic real-world studies in France.

Annales Médico-psychologiques, revue psychiatrique

Real-world studies of driving behaviour and safety have face validity and have the distinct advantage of focussing on driving in its natural habitat.

Accident Analysis & Prevention

This work reports on a visual tool that has been developed to supplement theoretical lessons on Global Navigation Satellite Systems (GNSS) with real-world studies of current constellations.

IFAC-PapersOnLine

As clinical and real-world studies unfold, a deeper understanding of the nature of the biomarker and its potential uses in drug development is gained.

Value in Health

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

1 human-written examples

Hence, future real world studies are therefore needed.

European Transport Research Review

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

Use "real-world studies" to emphasize the practical application and relevance of research, particularly when contrasting it with theoretical or simulated scenarios.

Common error

Avoid assuming that the results from "real-world studies" are universally applicable without considering the specific context and population in which the study was conducted. Acknowledge potential limitations and biases.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "real-world studies" primarily functions as a noun phrase, where "real-world" acts as an adjective modifying "studies". It is commonly used to describe a type of research methodology. Ludwig AI confirms its usability in written English.

Expression frequency: Very common

Frequent in

Science

75%

News & Media

15%

Formal & Business

5%

Less common in

Academia

2%

Encyclopedias

1%

Wiki

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

The phrase "real-world studies" is a grammatically correct and frequently used term, especially in scientific and news contexts, to denote research conducted in natural settings. Ludwig AI confirms that this phrase is perfectly usable in English. While it emphasizes ecological validity, it's important to consider the context and potential limitations when interpreting results. Alternatives like "practical research" or "field research" can be used depending on the specific focus. Overall, "real-world studies" serves to highlight the practical application and relevance of research findings.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

practical research

Focuses on the applicability and usefulness of the research findings.

applied studies

Highlights the practical application of the studies' methodologies and outcomes.

field research

Emphasizes the direct observation and data collection in natural environments.

empirical investigations

Stresses the reliance on observable evidence and real-world data.

naturalistic studies

Focuses on observing behavior in its natural context without manipulation.

observational research

Highlights the passive observation and recording of events in their natural setting.

real-life experiments

Combines the elements of reality and experimentation, suggesting less controlled environments.

authentic assessments

Focuses on evaluating performance in realistic, relevant contexts.

in situ investigations

Emphasizes that the investigations are conducted in the original or natural location.

contextual analyses

Highlights the importance of the environment and specific conditions in the study.

FAQs

How do I use "real-world studies" in a sentence?

"Real-world studies" are used to describe research conducted in natural settings, often to evaluate the effectiveness or impact of interventions in everyday contexts. For example: "The new policy was evaluated using "real-world studies" to assess its actual impact on the community."

What are some alternatives to "real-world studies"?

Depending on the context, you can use alternatives like "practical research", "applied studies", or "field research".

How do "real-world studies" differ from clinical trials?

"Real-world studies" typically involve a broader range of participants and settings compared to clinical trials, which often have strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. This allows for a more representative assessment of an intervention's effectiveness in diverse populations.

Are "real-world studies" more reliable than controlled experiments?

The reliability of "real-world studies" and controlled experiments depends on the research question and methodology. "Real-world studies" may offer higher ecological validity, while controlled experiments provide more rigorous control over variables, reducing the risk of confounding factors.