real errors of

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "real errors of" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing genuine mistakes or inaccuracies in a particular context, such as in research, writing, or analysis. Example: "The report highlighted the real errors of the previous study, emphasizing the need for more accurate data collection."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

4 human-written examples

"There are some real errors, of omission and commission, and it's not going to be a pretty picture".

The New York Times

The second class can be considered as "real" errors of the model.

Journal of Cheminformatics

The error budgets for the modelling were set very conservatively to 7 nT independent of the measurement location, even though it can be assumed that the real errors of the original data are around 5.6 nT (Langel 1974).

Earth, Planets and Space

The real errors of mean intra- and interobserver diameters were therefore 0.036 mm and 0.050 mm, respectively, with a standard deviation of less than 0.050 mm.

Acta Orthopaedica

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

54 human-written examples

The real error of the court's federalism decisions is that "the states are permitted to act unjustly" behind the shield of sovereign immunity.

The New York Times - Books

Applying the predicator on the traces, we can compute the real error of each prediction.

EURASIP Journal on Wireless Communications and Networking

The real error of my ways began to dawn on me shortly before my 40th birthday, when my husband ended our marriage.

Huffington Post

The absolute real error of femoral head penetration for groups B and C was 0.080 mm.

Acta Orthopaedica

We observed that the absolute real error of femoral head penetration was lower for group C (mean 0.055 mm) than for group B (mean 0.101 mm).

Acta Orthopaedica

We also noticed that the absolute real error of femoral head penetration was in general slightly higher for all-poly implants (mean 0.094 mm) than for metal-backed PE implants (mean 0.066 mm).

Acta Orthopaedica

Her critics, most of them Chinese immigrants, picked apart her story, and, though they found a few real errors, most of their criticism was highly speculative.

The New York Times

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When discussing research findings, quantify the "real errors of" your measurement or model to provide a clear understanding of its limitations.

Common error

Avoid exaggerating the impact of "real errors of" a system or analysis. Always present errors in context, comparing them to the overall scope and acceptable tolerances.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "real errors of" functions as a determiner phrase specifying the type of errors being discussed. It emphasizes that the errors are genuine and not merely theoretical or potential. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is grammatically correct and usable.

Expression frequency: Rare

Frequent in

Science

50%

News & Media

50%

Formal & Business

0%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

0%

Wiki

0%

Social Media

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "real errors of" is a grammatically sound way to describe genuine mistakes or inaccuracies. As confirmed by Ludwig AI, it is correct and usable in various contexts. It is most frequently encountered in scientific and news-related content, denoting a formal to neutral register. When using this phrase, ensure you quantify and contextualize the errors to avoid exaggeration. Alternatives like "actual mistakes in" or "genuine inaccuracies in" can be employed for slight variations in emphasis.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

actual mistakes in

Replaces 'real' with 'actual' for emphasis on genuineness.

genuine inaccuracies in

Substitutes 'errors' with 'inaccuracies' for a more precise nuance.

factual inaccuracies of

Replaces 'errors' with 'factual inaccuracies' to emphasize issues with facts.

true mistakes within

Uses 'true' instead of 'real' offering a slightly stronger affirmation of mistakes.

precise errors within

Replaces 'real' with 'precise', highlighting the exactness of the errors.

verifiable inaccuracies in

Replaces 'errors' with 'verifiable inaccuracies' shifting focus to the verifiability of the mistakes.

identifiable mistakes in

Replaces 'real' with 'identifiable', changing the sense to errors that can be found.

substantive faults within

Replaces 'errors' with 'substantive faults', which indicates more significant problems.

demonstrable flaws of

Emphasizes that the flaws can be shown or proven.

significant oversights in

Shifts the focus to failures to notice or do something.

FAQs

How can I use "real errors of" in a sentence?

You can use "real errors of" to describe actual mistakes or inaccuracies present in a system, model, or process. For example, "The analysis revealed the "real errors of" the predictive algorithm."

What's a good alternative to "real errors of"?

Alternatives include "actual mistakes in", "genuine inaccuracies in", or "factual inaccuracies of", depending on the context and the specific type of errors you want to emphasize.

When is it appropriate to use "real errors of" in writing?

It's appropriate to use "real errors of" when you need to clearly and directly identify and discuss actual mistakes or inaccuracies, particularly in technical or analytical contexts.

Is "real errors of" formal or informal language?

"Real errors of" is suitable for neutral to formal contexts. It is often found in scientific, technical, or professional writing where accuracy is important.