real arguments

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "real arguments" is correct and usable in written English.
You can use it when discussing valid, logical, or substantial points in a debate or discussion. Example: "In the debate, both sides presented real arguments that challenged each other's viewpoints."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Academia

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

36 human-written examples

But after the votes are safely garnered, the real arguments start.

The Economist

To be fair, Fischer acknowledges that some of the critics of Fidesz have real arguments.

The Economist

I do not see any real arguments against the ban, other than abstract ones.

Independent

It should be fact-based, deliberative and tested by real arguments.

The Guardian - Opinion

Yes, each debate had its silly theatre; but each also included real arguments over real policy differences.

The New Yorker

The report had been prepared in consultation with the Fund.The real arguments now concern longer-term reform.

The Economist

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

24 human-written examples

Argumentation is a good skill to have, but the real argument should be with oneself.

The New York Times

That's the real argument here.

The Economist

All of which strengthens the real argument – "vote for me!".

The Guardian

But is the real argument about intergenerational equity?

The Guardian - Opinion

"Ukraine has no single trump card, no real argument to stop military aggression.

The Economist

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When presenting an argument, ensure it's based on factual evidence and logical reasoning. Using "real arguments" can strengthen your position and make it more convincing.

Common error

Avoid substituting emotional appeals for factual evidence. While emotions can be persuasive, "real arguments" require a solid foundation of logic and data.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "real arguments" functions as a noun phrase, where "real" serves as an adjective modifying the noun "arguments". According to Ludwig, the examples demonstrate how this phrase is used to describe points that are genuine and substantial in various discussions or debates.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

54%

Academia

29%

Science

13%

Less common in

Encyclopedias

2%

Wiki

0%

Formal & Business

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "real arguments" is a commonly used and grammatically correct phrase that emphasizes the validity and substance of points in a discussion. As Ludwig AI confirms, it is used across various contexts, particularly in news, academia, and science. To enhance your writing, ensure your arguments are well-supported by evidence and logic, and avoid substituting emotional appeals. Related phrases include "valid arguments" and "substantive arguments". By focusing on "real arguments", you can strengthen your position and make it more persuasive.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

valid arguments

Emphasizes the logical soundness and factual basis of the arguments.

genuine arguments

Highlights the authenticity and sincerity of the arguments.

legitimate arguments

Suggests the arguments are lawful, justified, or in accordance with accepted rules.

substantive arguments

Focuses on the arguments having significant content and importance.

compelling arguments

Indicates the arguments are convincing and persuasive.

sound arguments

Implies the arguments are logically coherent and well-reasoned.

cogent arguments

Stresses the clarity and persuasiveness of the arguments.

convincing arguments

Focuses on the ability of the arguments to persuade or convince.

persuasive arguments

Similar to convincing, but with a stronger emphasis on influencing opinion.

well-founded arguments

Highlights that the arguments are based on solid evidence and reasoning.

FAQs

How can I effectively use "real arguments" in a debate?

To effectively use "real arguments" in a debate, ensure your points are based on verifiable facts and logical reasoning. Avoid personal attacks and focus on presenting evidence that supports your claims. Use alternatives like "valid arguments" or "substantive arguments" to add variety to your language.

What are some common mistakes to avoid when constructing "real arguments"?

Common mistakes include relying on anecdotal evidence, making logical fallacies, and ignoring counterarguments. Ensure your "real arguments" are well-researched, logically sound, and address potential objections.

Are there situations where using "real arguments" might not be the best approach?

In situations where emotional connection or shared values are more important than logical reasoning (such as in personal relationships or during times of crisis), relying solely on "real arguments" might not be the most effective approach. Consider using "persuasive arguments" or emphasizing empathy and understanding.

What is the difference between "real arguments" and opinions?

"Real arguments" are based on evidence and logical reasoning, whereas opinions are personal beliefs that may not be supported by facts. While opinions can be part of an argument, "real arguments" require a foundation of verifiable information.