ready to merge

USAGE SUMMARY

'ready to merge' is a correct and usable phrase in written English.
You can use it to describe someone's readiness to combine two things, with the understanding that the final product will be something different than either of the original components. For example, "The two companies are ready to merge and become one entity."

✓ Grammatically correct

News & Media

Wiki

Science

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

12 human-written examples

A dosa was crackling crisp on the outside and spongy soft inside, ready to merge with its filling of paneer cheese.

The New York Times - Food

The Spirit pub company has said it is ready to merge with Greene King, the pub and restaurant group that brews Old Speckled Hen and Abbot Ale.

The Guardian - Business

The Post also reported that Ms. Thomas's group, a nonprofit, appeared ready to merge with another conservative organization, the Patrick Henry Center for Individual Liberty, which is based in Manassas, Va.

The New York Times

Then there's that all-Wall Street B-S board of directors, rumored to be ready to merge with Spence, strip the school's assets, auction off the real estate, and start all over with something called the New Arbitrage School.

The New Yorker

Wood confides he's ready to merge or take on a strategic partner.

Forbes

It comes as the big names in the great outdoors get ready to merge to form a new organisation called Natural Resources Wales.

BBC

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

48 human-written examples

The rationale is a simple one according to Buckingham: "I believe we need to create one consistent employer brand value proposition, internally and externally". Are companies ready to actually merge HR and Marketing functions?

Forbes

The airlines now say they are ready to start merging later this month.It would be unfair to blame the disasters entirely on China's botched previous attempts at aviation reform.

The Economist

Moscow is no longer vehemently denouncing any and all U.S. talk of missile defense and instead appears ready to explore ways to merge its own evolving system with NATO's.

The New York Times

Partly because the Tennessee State case was complicated by a local desegregation fight (which led to the court order to merge), not everyone is ready to confer far-reaching significance on the school's new league alignment.

The New York Times - Sports

With its parent companies on track to merge, Cingular Wireless is readying a push to attract more corporate customers, a Cingular executive said Wednesday.

Forbes

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "ready to merge", ensure that the context clearly indicates what is being combined and the intended outcome of the merger. For example, specify the entities, systems, or ideas that are coming together to avoid ambiguity.

Common error

Avoid using "ready to merge" without specifying the subjects involved. Saying "They are ready to merge" lacks clarity. Instead, specify: "The two companies are ready to merge" or "The teams are ready to merge their strategies".

Linguistic Context

The phrase "ready to merge" functions as an adjective phrase followed by a verb infinitive. It describes the state of being prepared or willing to combine entities, operations, or resources. Ludwig AI indicates that the phrase is grammatically correct and commonly used.

Expression frequency: Common

Frequent in

News & Media

40%

Wiki

30%

Science

15%

Less common in

Formal & Business

10%

Reference

3%

Encyclopedias

2%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, the phrase "ready to merge" is a grammatically sound and commonly used expression that conveys a state of preparedness and willingness to combine or integrate. Ludwig AI confirms its correctness and widespread use. It is frequently found in news and media, wiki articles, and scientific publications, making it a versatile phrase for various contexts. When using "ready to merge", it is essential to specify what entities are being combined to ensure clarity and avoid overgeneralizations. Alternatives such as "prepared to consolidate" or "willing to integrate" can be used to add nuance to the intended meaning.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

prepared to consolidate

Emphasizes the state of being prepared for a consolidation process.

set to combine

Indicates a planned or scheduled combination of elements.

willing to integrate

Highlights the willingness to combine or incorporate different elements.

poised to unify

Suggests a state of readiness for unification or bringing together.

geared up to fuse

Emphasizes the readiness and preparation for a fusion process.

primed to amalgamate

Implies a preparation for the process of amalgamation or blending.

organized to unify

Stresses the organized effort towards unification.

disposed to converge

Highlights a tendency or inclination towards convergence.

inclined to join

Indicates a leaning or preference towards joining together.

predisposed to blend

Highlights a natural inclination or tendency to blend elements.

FAQs

How can I use "ready to merge" in a sentence?

You can use "ready to merge" to indicate that two or more entities are prepared to combine. For instance, "The departments are "ready to merge" their resources" or "The companies announced they are "ready to merge" operations".

What are some alternatives to "ready to merge"?

Alternatives include "prepared to consolidate", "willing to integrate", or "set to combine", depending on the nuance you want to convey.

Is it grammatically correct to say "ready to merge"?

Yes, it is grammatically correct. "Ready" functions as an adjective describing the state of preparedness, and "to merge" serves as an infinitive indicating the action they are prepared to take.

What's the difference between "ready to merge" and "about to merge"?

"Ready to merge" suggests a state of preparedness and willingness, while "about to merge" indicates that the merger is imminent or will happen very soon. The former focuses on the condition, the latter on the timing.