ratings of ability

USAGE SUMMARY

The phrase "ratings of ability" is correct and usable in written English.
It can be used when discussing assessments or evaluations of someone's skills or competencies. Example: "The ratings of ability provided by the evaluators were crucial in determining the best candidates for the job."

✓ Grammatically correct

Science

News & Media

Human-verified examples from authoritative sources

Exact Expressions

3 human-written examples

This is a potentially useful validation for future studies interested in using self-assessment ratings of ability to perform complex actions.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

After six months the intervention group had improved statistically significantly compared to the reference group on ratings of ability to manage stress, sleep quality, mental energy, concentration ability and social support.

BMC Public Health

Staff's BMI was significantly associated with staff ratings of their belief in their advice to influence women's GWG; higher BMIs were associated with greater staff ratings of ability to influence women (ß = 0.5, p = 0.013).

BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth

Human-verified similar examples from authoritative sources

Similar Expressions

57 human-written examples

At the end of the 6-month intervention period, the intervention group had improved significantly as compared to the reference group on ratings of perceived ability to manage stress, sleep quality, mental energy, concentration ability, social support and competence usage at work (2-way ANCOVA, p <.05 time × group effect).

BMC Public Health

In all three tests, subjects' ratings of their ability were positively linked to their actual scores.

The New York Times - Health

A high prevalence of symptoms was reported and ratings of work ability were high.

Applied Ergonomics

FG subjects had lower ratings of coping ability [t(2,16) = 2.437, p = .027 and higher ratings of hunger cues in the expected direction [t(2,16) = −2.061, p = .056] compared to NG subjects.

Behavioural Brain Research

Construct validity of the FFST with ratings of work ability was moderate.

BMC Health Services Research

Additionally, scores on the MMSE, CDT, and caregiver ratings of driving ability were analyzed.

BMC Geriatrics

Parental ratings of the ability of CI children to respond when their name was called were affected by the noise level in the domestic environment.

Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics

To explore the relationship between objective and subjective ratings of physical ability and how these might change with experience, we ran correlations between physical scores and reproducibility ratings pre- and posttraining.

Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences

Expert writing Tips

Best practice

When using "ratings of ability", ensure that the criteria for evaluation are clearly defined to avoid ambiguity. For example, specify whether the ratings are based on objective performance metrics or subjective assessments.

Common error

Avoid using "ratings of ability" without specifying the domain or context of the ability being rated. For instance, instead of saying "the ratings of ability were high", clarify with "the ratings of mathematical ability were high" to provide more specific information.

Linguistic Context

The phrase "ratings of ability" functions as a noun phrase typically used as an object or complement in a sentence. Ludwig examples show it describing assessments made by staff, parents, or systems, aligning with Ludwig AI's indication that the phrase is usable and correct.

Expression frequency: Uncommon

Frequent in

Science

70%

News & Media

20%

Formal & Business

10%

Less common in

Wiki

0%

Encyclopedias

0%

Reference

0%

Ludwig's WRAP-UP

In summary, "ratings of ability" is a grammatically sound phrase that denotes assessments of competence or skill levels. As Ludwig AI confirms, the phrase is perfectly usable in written English. While "ratings of ability" is most commonly found in scientific and academic contexts, the phrase also appears in news media, showcasing versatility across different registers. When using the phrase, it's essential to define the criteria for evaluation clearly and specify the context of the ability being assessed to prevent ambiguity. Considering alternative terms like "skill assessments" or "performance appraisals" can refine your message and provide greater clarity. Thus, while the usage is not as pervasive as other common phrases, it remains a valuable term for academic, professional, and even everyday discussions when the specific context is clear and well-defined.

More alternative expressions

Phrases that express similar concepts, ordered by semantic similarity:

skill assessments

Focuses specifically on evaluating skills, differing slightly from general ability.

competency evaluations

Emphasizes assessing competencies, implying a broader range of capabilities.

performance appraisals

Specifically refers to evaluating performance in a work or task context.

capability ratings

Highlights the rating of someone's capability, which is a broader term than ability.

aptitude assessments

Focuses on assessing natural talents or potential for learning skills.

proficiency ratings

Highlights the level of skill or expertise in a particular area.

talent evaluations

Emphasizes the evaluation of innate talents and abilities.

effectiveness ratings

Focuses on evaluating how effective someone is in performing tasks.

mastery assessments

Implies an evaluation of someone's complete mastery of a subject or skill.

expertise evaluations

Specifically relates to evaluating expert-level skills and knowledge.

FAQs

How can I use "ratings of ability" in a sentence?

You can use "ratings of ability" to describe assessments of someone's competence or skills. For example, "The "performance appraisals" included ratings of ability in leadership and communication." Alternatively, consider "skill assessments" or "competency evaluations".

What are some alternatives to "ratings of ability"?

Instead of "ratings of ability", you could use phrases like "skill assessments", "competency evaluations", or "performance appraisals" depending on the context. Each alternative emphasizes slightly different aspects of assessment.

What's the difference between "ratings of ability" and "skill assessments"?

"Ratings of ability" is a more general term that can encompass various types of evaluations, while "skill assessments" specifically refers to evaluations of particular skills. The choice depends on whether you want to emphasize a general capacity or specific skills.

Are there specific contexts where "ratings of ability" is more appropriate than other terms?

"Ratings of ability" is suitable when discussing overall evaluations of someone's capabilities, especially in contexts where multiple skills and competencies are being considered. In contrast, using "expertise evaluations" might be better when assessing someone's high-level proficiency in a specific domain.